Endoscopic versus open surgery in patients with malignant sinonasal tumours and brain invasion. A case series study

Caballero-García, Joel; Lugo, Elizabeth Bárbara Cuétara; Lence-Anta, Juan J; Fernández, Nélido Gonzáles; Hidalgo-Gonzáles, Adolfo; Kindelán-Agustín, Grisel

doi:10.1016/j.neucie.2021.04.005

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Numerous studies have shown comparable outcomes between EEA and open approaches when adjusting for tumor type, stage, margins, and other prognostic factors 14,182,264,265,280–299 . Husain et al.…”

Section: Surgical Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors

Kuan

Wang

Adappa

et al. 2024

Int Forum Allergy Rhinol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundSinonasal neoplasms, whether benign and malignant, pose a significant challenge to clinicians and represents a model area for multidisciplinary collaboration in order to optimize patient care. The International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors (ICSNT) aims to summarize the best available evidence and presents 48 thematic and histopathology‐based topics spanning the field.MethodsIn accordance with prior ICAR documents, ICSNT assigned each topic as an Evidence‐Based Review with Recommendations, Evidence‐Based Review, and Literature Review based on level of evidence. An international group of multidisciplinary author teams were assembled for the topic reviews using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses format, and completed sections underwent a thorough and iterative consensus‐building process. The final document underwent rigorous synthesis and review prior to publication.ResultsThe ICNST document consists of 4 major sections: general principles, benign neoplasms and lesions, malignant neoplasms, and quality of life and surveillance. It covers 48 conceptual and/or histopathology‐based topics relevant to sinonasal neoplasms and masses. Topics with a high level of evidence provided specific recommendations, while other areas summarized the current state of evidence. A final section highlights research opportunities and future directions, contributing to advancing knowledge and community intervention.ConclusionAs an embodiment of the multidisciplinary and collaborative model of care in sinonasal neoplasms and masses, ICSNT was designed as a comprehensive, international, and multidisciplinary collaborative endeavor. Its primary objective is to summarize the existing evidence in the field of sinonasal neoplasms and masses.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

show abstract

Section: Surgical Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%