Energy consumptions and CO2 emissions of different powertrains under real-world driving with various route characteristics

Suttakul, Pana; Fongsamootr, Thongchai; Wongsapai, Wongkot; Mona, Yuttana; Poolsawat, Kittikun

doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2022.05.216

Cited by 26 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Real-life measurements of the HEV and ICEV fuel consumptions, driven under different road conditions, show that the HEV has 49.3 % lower fuel consumption than the corresponding ICEV for the city driving and this result overlaps with our findings [4]. On average of all the route modes, the Well-to-Wheel CO 2 emissions of HEV and PHEV and the Well-to-Tank emissions of BEV, are about 65 %, 50 % and 35 % respectively, compared to the corresponding ICEV.…”

Section: Figure 1 Average Co 2 Emissions From Icev Vehicles Observed ...supporting

confidence: 89%

“…Vehicles with such parameters are widely used nowadays. This scientific research [4] is new and such achievements are normal for the HEVs built after 2009, especially for the models built after 2015. The results seem to be great, but another study concludes that BEVs consume significant energy for heating the interior and windscreens to prevent condensation in cold weather leading to an estimated reduction in range of approximately 28 % in some situations [5].…”

Section: Figure 1 Average Co 2 Emissions From Icev Vehicles Observed ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…On average of all the route modes, the Well-to-Wheel CO 2 emissions of HEV and PHEV and the Well-to-Tank emissions of BEV, are about 65 %, 50 % and 35 % respectively, compared to the corresponding ICEV. For extra urban driving the HEV has 35.4 % lower fuel consumption for prevailingly flat road and 31.1 % for hilly roads [4]. The characteristics of the compared vehicles are presented in Table 1.…”

Section: Figure 1 Average Co 2 Emissions From Icev Vehicles Observed ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Gap Analysis in Eco Categories, Electric Vehicle Comparison and Solutions to Global Transport Challenges

Keseev¹

2023

Communications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ResumeNowadays, the world is facing many challenges that require a fast environmental and energy transition, but some obstacles have been found. A gap analysis has been made and the conclusion is that there are flaws in the eco categories distribution of different types of electric vehicles. A comparison is done and the conclusions are that hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) and plugin hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) with smaller batteries are the most versatile, while the battery electric vehicles (BEVs) are good primarily for urban driving. The BEVs reduce the urban pollution, but the global ecological effects are rather controversial and their usage still has many limitations. A discussion of adequate options and solutions for the transport pollution and energy problems is presented. The ultimate goal is to provoke adjustments in government transportation policies towards appropriate solutions that solve today's pollution problems in better and more adequate way.

show abstract

Section: Figure 1 Average Co 2 Emissions From Icev Vehicles Observed ...supporting

confidence: 89%

Section: Figure 1 Average Co 2 Emissions From Icev Vehicles Observed ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Figure 1 Average Co 2 Emissions From Icev Vehicles Observed ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Gap Analysis in Eco Categories, Electric Vehicle Comparison and Solutions to Global Transport Challenges

Keseev¹

2023

Communications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Regarding CO 2 emissions, it is clear that there is a great difference between internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEV) and battery electric vehicles during their usage [ 1 ]. This has also been proven by real-world driving investigations [ 2 , 3 ]. A crucial factor in the CO 2 emissions of electric vehicles (EV) is the electricity production mix which is used to charge the batteries.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 55%

Evaluating battery electric vehicle usage in the EU: A comparative study based on member state energy mixes

Kocsis,

T. Kiss,

Arpad

2024

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Researchers have so far carried out many studies on zero-emission vehicles, such as analyzing the influencing factors of the energy consumption of electric vehicles and their impact degrees [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30], analyzing and predicting the energy consumption of electric buses [31][32][33], discussing the feasibility of the electrification of taxis or ride-hailing vehicles [34,35], studying charging behavior and predicting charging demand [36,37], assessing the potential for carbon reduction over the entire life cycle [38], exploring the transition process of traditional cars to electric cars in developing countries [39], etc. However, most studies use model simulation or experimental methods, and a few studies manage to combine the actual driving data of passenger cars on actual roads [21,24,25,28,[34][35][36].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of the Actual Usage and Emission Reduction Potential of Electric Heavy-Duty Trucks: A Case Study of a Steel Plant

Dou,

Ke,

Liang

et al. 2023

Atmosphere

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In order to understand the driving characteristics of electric heavy-duty trucks in practical application scenarios and promote their usage to replace diesel trucks, this study analyzed the actual usage of electric and diesel heavy-duty trucks in a steel factory based on vehicle-monitoring data and remote online monitoring data and estimated the emission reduction potential of the application of electric trucks by using a mileage-based method and the greenhouse gas emission model. The results showed that the electric heavy-duty trucks in the steel factory mostly operated for over 14 h, with a vehicle kilometers traveled (VKT) of 50–300 km each day, which could meet most of the demands of the transportation of the steel industry. The average daily energy consumption for most trucks falls within the range of 210–230 kWh/100 km, with higher consumption in winter than in summer, which can save approximately 18–26% in operating costs compared with diesel trucks. It is estimated that the usage of these electric heavy-duty trucks can achieve an annual reduction of 115.8 tons of NOx emissions, 0.7 tons of PM emissions, and 18,000 tons of CO2 emissions. To further promote the application of electric heavy-duty trucks in China, several policy suggestions, such as introducing priority road-right policies, promoting vehicle and battery leasing markets, and exempting zero-emission vehicles during heavy pollution days, were proposed.

show abstract

Energy consumptions and CO2 emissions of different powertrains under real-world driving with various route characteristics

Cited by 26 publications

References 10 publications

Gap Analysis in Eco Categories, Electric Vehicle Comparison and Solutions to Global Transport Challenges

Gap Analysis in Eco Categories, Electric Vehicle Comparison and Solutions to Global Transport Challenges

Evaluating battery electric vehicle usage in the EU: A comparative study based on member state energy mixes

Analysis of the Actual Usage and Emission Reduction Potential of Electric Heavy-Duty Trucks: A Case Study of a Steel Plant

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About