Energy Optimization For Hybrid ARQ With Turbo Coding: Rate Adaptation and Allocation

Zhang, Bentao; Milstein, L.B.; Cosman, Pamela C.

doi:10.1109/tvt.2020.3009681

Cited by 9 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…1) Turbo codes: [43]- [50] 2) TPCs: [42], [51]- [56] 3) LDPC codes: [57]- [70] 4) Polar codes: [71]- [78] Other codes such as Reed-Solomon, convolutional and Bose-Chaudhuri-Hocquenghem (BCH) codes have been considered for HARQ, however, such codes have been replaced by the aforementioned more powerful codes.…”

Section: A Forward Error Correctionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request (HARQ) in Wireless Communications Systems and Standards: A Contemporary Survey

Ahmed

Al-Dweik

Iraqi

et al. 2021

IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Automatic repeat request (ARQ) schemes, and in particular hybrid-ARQ (HARQ) schemes, which jointly adopt forward error correction (FEC) and ARQ, are essential to provide reliable data transmission in wireless communications systems. However, the feedback from the receiver to the transmitter and the retransmission process used in ARQ incurs significant cost in terms of power efficiency, throughput, computational power and delay. Unfortunately, such drawbacks can limit their applications to several current and emerging technologies. More specifically, the increasing number of wireless users has create spectrum scarcity, relying on small-size batteries create power constraints, deployment of real-time applications boost the demand for ultralow delay networks, and the ultra-small low-cost internet of things (IoT) devices has limited signal processing and computation capabilities. Consequently, extensive research efforts have been dedicated to overcome the limitations inherent in HARQ. This survey paper provides an extensive literature review of the stateof-the-art HARQ techniques and discusses their integration in various wireless technologies. Moreover, it provides insights on advantages and disadvantages of particular ARQ types and discusses open problems and future directions.

show abstract

Section: A Forward Error Correctionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request (HARQ) in Wireless Communications Systems and Standards: A Contemporary Survey

Ahmed

Al-Dweik

Iraqi

et al. 2021

IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…• Feedback implementation: The issue of imperfect/outdated channel state information (CSI) feedback is critical in the implementation of link-layer retransmission protocols with PHY adaptation schemes (e.g., rate/power adaptation) in RF systems [51]. Nevertheless, the CSI feedback is relatively easy to implement in FSO systems.…”

Section: Motivations and Contributionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Link-Layer Retransmission-Based Error-Control Protocols in FSO Communications: A Survey

Pham

2022

IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Free space optical (FSO) communication has established a reputation for itself capable of delivering high-speed data services over long distances without exhausting radio frequency (RF) resources. FSO communication can be considered in different network scenarios, including inter-satellite/deep-space links, ground-station/vehicles, satellite/aerial links, and terrestrial links. It is expected to be one of the key enabling technologies for the next generation of 6G wireless networks. Nevertheless, despite the great potential of FSO communications, its performance suffers from various limitations and challenges: atmospheric turbulence, clouds, weather conditions, and pointing misalignment. The error-control solutions, including physical layer (PHY) and linklayer methods, aim to mitigate the transmission errors caused by such adverse issues. While the existing surveys on errorcontrol solutions in FSO systems primarily focussed on the PHY methods, we instead provide a review of link-layer solutions. In particular, we conduct an extensive literature survey of state-ofthe-art retransmission protocols, both automatic repeat request (ARQ) and hybrid ARQ (HARQ), for various FSO communication scenarios, including point-to-point terrestrial, cooperative, multi-hop relaying, hybrid FSO/RF, satellite/aerial, and deepspace systems. Furthermore, we provide a survey of recent literature and insightful discussion on the cross-layer design frameworks related to link-layer retransmission protocols in FSO communication networks. Finally, the lessons learned, design guidelines, related open issues, and future research directions are exposed.

show abstract

“…The advantage of using HIHO can be also improved when using advanced schemes as described in [19], [22]. Examples for research that considered particular FEC and HARQ are: 1) Turbo codes: [43]- [50] 2) TPCs: [42], [51]- [56] 3) LDPC codes: [57]- [70] 4) Polar codes: [71]- [78] Other codes such as Reed-Solomon, convolutional and Bose-Chaudhuri-Hocquenghem (BCH) codes have been considered for HARQ, however, such codes have been replaced by the aforementioned more powerful codes.…”

Section: A Forward Error Correctionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request (HARQ) in Wireless Communications Systems and Standards: A Contemporary Survey

Ahmed¹,

Al-Dweik²,

Iraqi³

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

<div>Automatic repeat request (ARQ) schemes, and in particular hybrid-ARQ (HARQ) schemes, which jointly adopt forward error correction (FEC) and ARQ, are essential to provide reliable data transmission in wireless communications systems. However, the feedback from the receiver to the transmitter and the retransmission process used in ARQ incurs significant cost in terms of power efficiency, throughput, computational power and delay. Unfortunately, such drawbacks can limit their applications to several current and emerging technologies. More specifically, the increasing number of wireless users has create spectrum scarcity, relying on small-size batteries create power constraints, deployment of real-time applications boost the demand for ultralow delay networks, and the ultra-small low-cost internet of things (IoT) devices has limited signal processing and computation capabilities. Consequently, extensive research efforts have been dedicated to overcome the limitations inherent in HARQ. This survey paper provides an extensive literature review of the state-of-the-art HARQ techniques and discusses their integration in various wireless technologies. Moreover, it provides insights on advantages and disadvantages of particular ARQ types and discusses open problems and future directions.</div>

show abstract

Energy Optimization For Hybrid ARQ With Turbo Coding: Rate Adaptation and Allocation

Cited by 9 publications

References 42 publications

Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request (HARQ) in Wireless Communications Systems and Standards: A Contemporary Survey

Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request (HARQ) in Wireless Communications Systems and Standards: A Contemporary Survey

Link-Layer Retransmission-Based Error-Control Protocols in FSO Communications: A Survey

Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request (HARQ) in Wireless Communications Systems and Standards: A Contemporary Survey

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About