Energy released in fission

James, Michael F.

doi:10.1016/0022-3107(69)90042-2

Cited by 71 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The thermal power and the fission fractions are both functions of time and are supplied by the reactor operator, while the energy contributing to the thermal power per fission of each actinide (e i ) is normally taken from refs. [9][10][11]. Over most of the observed spectrum at the three experiments the measured shape differs from the predictions, and the measurements in the 4-6 MeV prompt-energy (E ν ≈ E prompt + 0.782 MeV) shoulder region represent an ∼ 4σ deviation from expectation.…”

mentioning

confidence: 59%

Possible origins and implications of the shoulder in reactor neutrino spectra

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We analyze within a nuclear database framework the shoulder observed in the antineutrino spectra in current reactor experiments. We find that the ENDF/B-VII.1 database predicts that the antineutrino shoulder arises from an analogous shoulder in the aggregate fission beta spectra. In contrast, the JEFF-3.1.1 database does not predict a shoulder for two out of three of the modern reactor neutrino experiments, and the shoulder that is predicted by JEFF-3.1.1 arises from 238 U. We consider several possible origins of the shoulder, and find possible explanations. For example, there could be a problem with the measured aggregate beta spectra, or the harder neutron spectrum at a light-water power reactor could affect the distribution of beta-decaying isotopes. In addition to the fissile actinides, we find that 238 U could also play a significant role in distorting the total antineutrino spectrum. Distinguishing these and quantifying whether there is an anomaly associated with measured reactor neutrino signals will require new short-baseline experiments, both at thermal reactors and at reactors with a sizable epithermal neutron component.Modern reactor neutrino experiments measuring θ 13 , such as Daya Bay [1], RENO [2], and Double Chooz [3], involve detectors both near and far from the reactors. The shape and magnitude of the antineutrino spectra emitted from the reactors have been measured to high accuracy in the near detectors of both Daya Bay and RENO. The Daya Bay near-detector has also provided an absolute determination of the reactor antineutrino flux, and this is consistent in magnitude with the previous world average short-baseline reactor neutrino experiments. As such, the measured magnitude is consistent with a deficit with respect to the most recent estimates [4,5] of the expected reactor antineutrino flux. The absolute magnitude of the RENO flux has yet to be published. However, in the near detector of both RENO and Daya Bay the shapes of the measured spectra are not consistent with the antineutrino spectrum predictions [4,5] that we refer to as the Huber-Mueller model. Most notably, the measured antineutrino spectra exhibit a significant shoulder relative to the model predictions at antineutrino energies ∼ 5 − 7 MeV. The spectra measured at Daya Bay, RENO, and Double Chooz all exhibit this shoulder. Thus, there are two puzzles associated with measured reactor antineutrino spectra: (1) the yield in all short-baseline experiments is lower than current models, and (2) the shape of the measured spectra deviate from these model predictions. However, these two issues are not necessarily related.In the Daya Bay, RENO and Double Chooz experiments the antineutrinos are measured by detecting the positrons produced in inverse beta decay on the protons (ν e + p → n + e + ) in the detector, and the positron energy is reconstructed from the scintillation light created by the kinetic energy of the positron and its annihilation. The antineutrino spectrum S(E ν ) emitted from a reactor is determined by [6] the reactor ther...

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 59%

Possible origins and implications of the shoulder in reactor neutrino spectra

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The fie spectra of the most important fission products 7 MeV is less than 6% for period 2 and less than 3% for period 3, whereas it is less than 2% for E, 5 7MeV during both periods. The fie spectrum of the source during period j is then given by and finally the & spectrum is obtained if we insert this result in Eq.…”

Section: N E U T R I N O S O U R C E P a R A M E T E R Smentioning

confidence: 82%

“…The average thermal reactor power Pth, the effective energy release per fission Ei[7], and the contributions G i of the most important isotopes to the number of fissions in % for the three measuring periods are shown. The values C i were obtained by averaging over the compositions of the fuel elements.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Experimental search for the neutrino decayν3→νj+
Hagner
¹
,
Altmann
²
,
Feilitzsch
³

et al. 1995
Phys. Rev. D

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An experiment searching for the neutrino decay u s + v j + e+ + e-has been performed at the nuclear power reactor of Bugey. The experimental setup and the data analysis are presented. No evidence for this decay has been found and stringent limits on the coupling 1~~3 1 ' of a massive neutrino in the range of 1 MeV to 10 MeV to an electron are derived. Consequences for the existence of a massive Y, are briefly discussed in the context of astrophysical and cosmological arguments.PACS number(s): 14.60.Pq, 13.35.Hb

show abstract

“…For the first time, thermal fission energies were calculated more than 30 years ago [14]. Later on, a new calculation was performed [15] in connection with neutrino investigations at the Rovno atomic power plant.…”

Section: Concluding Commentsmentioning

confidence: 99%