Enfoques teóricos en Arqueología

Gonzalo, Almudena Hernando

doi:10.12795/spal.1992.i1.01

Cited by 10 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This deliberately similar treatment suggests the creation of symbolic parallels between humans, animals, and objects, giving them the same ontological status, without any distinction in their power for action. Their association would serve to underlie a world-view based on the construction of the self in a more fluid way, in which the person is recognized as composite and multiple-authored (Chapman, 2000; Hernando Gonzalo, 2002; Brück, 2004; Fowler, 2004; Budja, 2010; for discussions related to southern Iberian ditched enclosures, see Márquez-Romero, 2004; Valera, 2016; Evangelista & Valera, 2019).…”

Section: Conclusion: Making Sense Of Body Manipulationmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Deposition of Human Remains Inside Chalcolithic Ditched Enclosures: Ditch 5 at Marroquíes (Jaén, Spain)

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the last few decades, the discovery of large ditched enclosures in Iberia has revealed the diversity and complexity of deposition and manipulation of human bone remains. Alongside traditional ritual burials (mainly megalithic tombs and hypogea), fragmented and scattered human bones mixed with other kinds of material culture began to appear in many features. This is the case for Ditch 5 at Marroquíes, which offers an excellent opportunity to explore this ritual behaviour. Based on a multi-proxy approach, three main conclusions can be drawn: 1) the skeletal elements present show deliberate selection of particular categories of bones; 2) depositional episodes included the remains of people who died at different points in time and were subject to different taphonomic processes, and 3) mobility patterns indicate that all individuals, with one possible exception, were local. The movement and manipulations of body parts may reflect the active role of people after death as social and symbolic elements that retain agency and capacity for action.

show abstract

Section: Conclusion: Making Sense Of Body Manipulationmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Deposition of Human Remains Inside Chalcolithic Ditched Enclosures: Ditch 5 at Marroquíes (Jaén, Spain)

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Gender studies published in archaeology in the 1980s and 1990s (Dahlberg, 1981; Arnold et al, 1988; Ehrenberg, 1989; Gero & Conkey, 1991; Grauer & Stuart-Macadam, 1998), and later consolidated in the first two decades of the twenty-first century (see Alberti & Back Danielsson, 2014; Dommasnes, 2014; Montón-Subías, 2014 for a review of the main publications), have rarely focused on the causes and forms of early gender dissymmetries. Although not strictly archaeological in its focus, Almudena Hernando Gonzalo's work (2005, 2012) has dealt with this issue from a more theoretical standpoint. Also, it is worth mentioning Marija Gimbutas’ classic research into Neolithic and Bronze Age Europe (1974, 1993), where she proposed the transformation of ‘agricultural, matricentric, and matrilineal’ Neolithic societies (Gimbutas, 1993: 211) into the pastoralist, patrilineal, and patriarchal ones of the Bronze Age.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Gender Inequalities in Neolithic Iberia: A Multi-Proxy Approach

Peña

Sanjuán

2019

Eur. j. archaeol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Gender archaeology approaches to Iberian late prehistory have experienced a significant growth in the last two decades. However, much of the work undertaken has focused on specific aspects of the archaeological record (rock art, burial practices), particularly from the Bronze Age and Iron Age periods for which the evidence is more readily available. In addition, it has tended to be regional or local in scope. Here, we attempt an empirically robust multi-proxy approach to the development of early gender inequalities in Neolithic Iberia. Inspired by Gerda Lerner's ideas on the origins of patriarchy and based on a systematic collection of data analysed by means of significance testing, we present the first comprehensive study of gender dissymmetries in Iberian prehistory. Our conclusions suggest that, first, the multi-proxy method used has potential for the systematic study of gender inequalities on the basis of archaeological data and, second, that the Neolithic witnessed emerging gender inequalities that set the basis for male domination in later periods.

show abstract

“…Para ello se ha acudido a la literatura general existente sobre el tema y no tanto a obras concretas que expresan las nociones particulares de autores como teóricos individuales. Los estudios consultados para tal fin han sido: Alcina (1989), Fernández Martínez (2000, Harris (1996Harris ( [1979Harris ( ] y 2004Harris ( [1981), Hernando (1992), Johnson (2000), Renfrew y Bahn (1998) y Trigger (1992. No se han encontrado apenas referencias en ellos a la Arqueología darwiniana, razón por la cual se ha tenido que acudir a escritos puntuales de arqueólogos que participan de este modelo evolutivo: Escacena (2002a), Hart y Terrell (2002), López y Cardillo (2009), Maschner (1996), Muscio (2002Muscio ( y 2006 y Rindos (1990).…”

Section: Introducción: Objetivos Metodología Y Otros Aspectosunclassified

Evolucionismos y Ciencias Históricas: darwinismo vs.lamarckismo en Arqueología

Pérez-Aguilar¹

2011

Spal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resumen: El evolucionismo no es un pensamiento estanco. Más bien se trata de un cuerpo científico que ha experimentado cambios. De una parte, pueden distinguirse en la actualidad dos grandes corrientes: el lamarckismo y el darwinismo. Por otra, el segundo sobre todo ha cambiado desde Darwin hasta hoy. Este trabajo analiza el desarrollo de estas dos grandes líneas teóricas desde el siglo XIX hasta la actualidad, y hace hincapié en la importancia de las mismas para el estudio del animal humano, objeto-sujeto tanto de la Historia como de la Arqueología. Palabras clave: Evolucionismo, lamarckismo, darwinismo, síntesis evolutiva, sociobiología, arqueología darwinista, arqueología lamarckista.Abstract: Evolutionism is not a closed notion. On the contrary, this scientific discipline has experienced some changes. On one hand, it is possible to distinguish nowadays two major trends: Lamarckism and Darwinism. Moreover, the latest has changed since Darwin's times. This work examines the development of these two major evolutionist theory trends from 19 th century to date, making especial emphasis in their importance regarding the study of the human animal, object-subject either in History and Archaeology. Key words: Evolutionism, lamarckism, darwinism, evolutionary synthesis, sociobiology, darwinian archaeology, lamarckian archaeology. INTRODUCCIÓN: OBJETIVOS, METODOLOGÍA Y OTROS ASPECTOSPor regla general, cuando en las Ciencias Sociales se hace mención del evolucionismo, suele darse por sabido que dicha corriente teórica es algo muy concreto y homogéneo. Así, en lo que menos hincapié suelen hacer los estudiosos del tema es en la diversidad de posicionamientos teóricos que encierra dicho concepto; de ahí el error, por ejemplo, de proclamar darwinista a corrientes evolucionistas que nada o poco tienen que ver con la propuesta teórica de Charles Darwin. Muchas veces se han venido haciendo críticas al evolucionismo sin conocerse bien a qué versión del mismo se refieren, con lo que, al confundirse el todo con la parte, se han hecho acusaciones globalizadoras que carecen de fundamento. O no han sabido precisar sus autores la corriente epistemológica concreta, o no han comprendido de qué evolucionismo estaban hablando. Para ilustrar el caso citaremos un fragmento de la obra de Susan Bock sobre los hunos: "Cuando los chinos llegaron a una zona donde tuvieron que cambiar sus instituciones económicas por razones geográficas (donde tendrían que abandonar la agricultura por irrigación y diversificar su modo de existencia), pusieron un límite artificial * Agradezco a los doctores J. L. Escacena Carrasco y J. C. del Río Andrade los consejos y la ayuda que en todo momento me han prestado. ** Becario FPU. Dpto. de Prehistoria y Arqueología, Universidad de Sevilla. Este trabajo se enmarca dentro de las actividades de investigación del grupo "HUM-402" del Plan Andaluz de Investigación.

show abstract

Enfoques teóricos en Arqueología

Cited by 10 publications

References 0 publications

The Deposition of Human Remains Inside Chalcolithic Ditched Enclosures: Ditch 5 at Marroquíes (Jaén, Spain)

The Deposition of Human Remains Inside Chalcolithic Ditched Enclosures: Ditch 5 at Marroquíes (Jaén, Spain)

Gender Inequalities in Neolithic Iberia: A Multi-Proxy Approach

Evolucionismos y Ciencias Históricas: darwinismo vs.lamarckismo en Arqueología

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About