Engaging diverse patients in a diverse world: the development and preliminary evaluation of educational modules to support diversity in patient engagement research

Abstract

Background Current practices for engaging patients in patient-oriented research (POR) result in a narrow pool of patient perspectives being reflected in POR. This project aims to address gaps in methodological knowledge to foster diversity in POR, through the co-design and evaluation of a series of educational modules for health researchers in British Columbia, Canada. Methods Modules were co-created by a team of academic researchers and patient partners from hardly-reached communities. The modules are presented using the Tapestry Tool, an interactive, online educational platform. Our evaluation framework focused on engagement, content quality, and predicted behavior change. The User Engagement Scale short form (UES-SF) measured participants’ level of engagement with the modules. Survey evaluation items assessed the content within the modules and participants' perceptions of how the modules will impact their behavior. Evaluation items modeled on the theory of planned behavior, administered before and after viewing the modules, assessed the impact of the modules on participants’ perceptions of diversity in POR. Results Seventy-four health researchers evaluated the modules. Researchers’ engagement and ratings of module content were high. Subjective behavioral control over fostering diversity in POR increased significantly after viewing the modules. Conclusions Our results suggest the modules may be an engaging way to provide health researchers with tools and knowledge to increase diversity in health research. Future studies are needed to investigate best practices for engaging with communities not represented in this pilot project, such as children and youth, Indigenous Peoples, and Black communities. While educational interventions represent one route to increasing diversity in POR, individual efforts must occur in tandem with high-level changes that address systemic barriers to engagement.

Meaningful Patient Engagement in Adolescent and Young Adult (AYA) Cancer Research: A Framework for Qualitative Studies

“…More than ever, there have been calls for consideration of EDI in cancer research [20,21]. This, combined with the lack of representation, which has also been noted as a challenge in patient engagement in research [22,23] and oncology research [24], made it particularly important to address EDI in the FUTURE Study. Our consideration of EDI when working with PRPs included taking steps to ensure representation among PRPs, reflecting on internal biases, and implementing measures for PRPs to be supported and seen.…”

Primus Inter PARES: First among equals—practical strategies for young adult PAtient RESearch partners (PARES) by young adult PARES

“…This ensures that the collaborative spirit endures beyond the project's lifespan. The exclusion of diverse groups and the presence of systemic discrimination [4,15,35,42] are challenges we tackle with our Unity in Diversity approach. This strategy ensures the intentional inclusion of underrepresented groups in our research team, study, process and narrative, fostering a setting that celebrates diverse strengths and contributions while actively working against discrimination and stigma.…”