Engineering Change Risk Assessment: Quantitative and qualitative change characterization

Eltaief, Ameni; Makhlouf, Aicha Ben; Amor, Sabrine Ben; Remy, Sébastien; Louhichi, Borhen; Eynard, Benoît

doi:10.1016/j.compind.2022.103656

Cited by 11 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In terms of risk management and control of construction projects, most existing studies analyze the causes of engineering changes from the perspective of engineering construction stakeholders and evaluate the risks arising from engineering changes [12][13][14][15]. Changes in engineering and construction projects are caused by a variety of factors, the most influential of which is design change [16,17].…”

Section: Design Change Riskmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research on the Risk-Inducing Factors of Prefabricated Building Design Change Based on Improved DEMATEL-ISM

Sun,

Geng,

Zhao

et al. 2023

Buildings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Under the background of China’s progress towards the goals of “carbon peak” and “carbon neutrality”, prefabricated buildings have developed rapidly due to their advantages of energy conservation and environmental protection, low construction cost, and high efficiency. While much attention has been paid to prefabricated buildings, less has been studied about the risk factors that cause engineering changes. In this paper, the factors that induce the risk of design change were identified from six aspects: personnel management, resource management, organization management, information and communication, collaboration mechanism, and technical level. The improved DEMATEL-ISM model was established in a fuzzy environment, the relationship between the influencing factors was quantitatively analyzed, the hierarchy between the factors was intuitively reflected, and the driving force and dependence of each factor were clearly displayed; it was concluded that poor organizational ability, errors and omissions in design, time lag between design and construction, immature component splitting and deepening design technology, and low standardization of production components in component factories are the key factors that induce the risk of design change. Finally, management implications for the relationship between various factors were proposed. This article provides references and help for the construction industry to effectively manage the risks caused by design changes.

show abstract

Section: Design Change Riskmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research on the Risk-Inducing Factors of Prefabricated Building Design Change Based on Improved DEMATEL-ISM

Sun,

Geng,

Zhao

et al. 2023

Buildings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…On the contrary to Serial Engineering process, Concurrent Engineering (CE), which emerged in 1990s, focuses on tasks' timing and duration across its entire organization with the goals of reducing task's time without any apparent loss in value to the finished product or services [33][34][35] It includes involvement of personnel from all required disciplines: engineers or non-engineers [36] In CE, all major parties involve in getting the product to market and contribute to the development of the product [37] The approach requires a parallel interactive (managed) and cooperative multidisciplinary team approach to product and process development. In short, CE is leveraging the teamwork to handle information and make informed decisions [27].…”

Section: Concurrent Engineering Vs Serial Engineeringmentioning

confidence: 99%

Design/Engineering For Production (DEFP) and Shipyard: A Review on the Malaysian Technological Aspects and Practices

Abdullah

Lazim

2022

ARASET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Design/Engineering for Production (DEFP) DEFP is viewed as a function and strategic resource of the shipyard. More importantly, the ability to strengthen DEFP would enable the shipbuilding industry to gain competitive advantage. This paper examines the role of Design/Engineering for Production (DEFP) as strategic decision in the shipbuilding industry. Incorporating evidence from reviews of relevant literature, this study demonstrates that there were abundant opportunities for DEFP, thus, proves that the role of DEFP was important. Moreover, the current approach focusing on transformation programs which emphasized on enhancement and effectiveness of planning and DEFP functions were justified. The company’s investment in this area of concerned eventually would bring up the competitiveness of the company. Indirectly, the effort would also be contributing to the continual growth of the local shipbuilding and ship repair industry.

show abstract

“…Engineering change management is a highly relevant topic in today's engineering. The analysis and propagation of change impacts in different areas of development require a thorough assessment (Eltaief et al, 2022;Jarratt et al, 2011). Several approaches exist to cope with those engineering changes at different stages of the system development process, such as Li et al (2022b), Tang et al (2008) or Germani et al (2007).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nevertheless, the continuity between system modeling and discipline-specific development is acknowledged as issue (Brahmi et al, 2021;Brahmi et al, 2020). CAD models are commonly affected by change impacts and derived adjustments, which may cause further consequences for the overall system, such as time inefficiency or individual-related knowledge (Eltaief et al, 2022). Within this paper, the nature of MBSE and engineering changes is examined to develop a framework for model and model element linking on selected levels of detail to realize opportunities regarding the link of CAD models and system models.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Combining System Models and CAD for Change Scenario Management

Hick,

Sanladerer,

Trautner

et al. 2023

INCOSE International Symp

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the development of complex mechatronic systems, interdisciplinary cooperation requires an exchange between stakeholders in order to ensure fulfillment of requirements and related functions. The cooperation of the stakeholders from different disciplines must be well coordinated to address systems changes. The system model as an essential aspect of model‐based systems engineering, has to be linked to specific models of involved disciplines (mechanical, electrical/electronical and software) to enable a basis for automatic identification e.g., of affected subsystems and functions. This contribution discusses the potential of model linking from the perspective of change scenarios by considering published approaches to link system models and computer‐aided design (CAD). A methodical approach on how descriptive system models can be used as base for computer‐aided design is presented. This approach is analyzed by reviewing a use case for a design change scenario of an automotive eAxle.

show abstract

Engineering Change Risk Assessment: Quantitative and qualitative change characterization

Cited by 11 publications

References 34 publications

Research on the Risk-Inducing Factors of Prefabricated Building Design Change Based on Improved DEMATEL-ISM

Research on the Risk-Inducing Factors of Prefabricated Building Design Change Based on Improved DEMATEL-ISM

Design/Engineering For Production (DEFP) and Shipyard: A Review on the Malaysian Technological Aspects and Practices

Combining System Models and CAD for Change Scenario Management

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About