2014 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence 2014
DOI: 10.1109/csci.2014.97
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced First-Fit Decreasing Algorithm for Energy-Aware Job Scheduling in Cloud

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
16
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…2, our EATS-FFD effectively reduces energy consumption by 20% compared with EFFD (Recall that in [16], we have shown that EFFD reduced energy consumption by about 10% compared with the traditional FFD). Clearly, exploitation of DFVS helps further reduce energy consumption pretty significantly.…”
Section: A Basic Setting Of Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2, our EATS-FFD effectively reduces energy consumption by 20% compared with EFFD (Recall that in [16], we have shown that EFFD reduced energy consumption by about 10% compared with the traditional FFD). Clearly, exploitation of DFVS helps further reduce energy consumption pretty significantly.…”
Section: A Basic Setting Of Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The third case (row 3 in Table II) decreased the number of nodes to 15, the number of VMs to 30, and the number of tasks to 100. Previously, our group had proposed two other related algorithms, EFFD [16] and EWRR (both are enhanced version of their respective base algorithm). The former extended the traditional FFD scheduling with VM Reuse and migration, and the latter extended the traditional WRR with DVFS.…”
Section: A Basic Setting Of Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drawback is that it may reduce the QoS of user. Alahmadi et al proposed a novel approach for scheduling, sharing, and migrating virtual machines (VMs) for a bag of cloud tasks to reduce energy consumption with guaranteed certain execution time and high system throughput [19]. However, it does not take into account the additional energy caused by dynamical monitor cloud systems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, VM placement has received extensive attention [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Researchers have studied various VM placement models and algorithms to optimize the mapping between VMs and PMs to obtain a higher resource utilization of PMs, better load balance among all running hosts, and lower energy consumption of the data center.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have studied various VM placement models and algorithms to optimize the mapping between VMs and PMs to obtain a higher resource utilization of PMs, better load balance among all running hosts, and lower energy consumption of the data center. In [2][3][4], VM placement is regarded as a bin packing problem. Algorithms such as first fit decreasing (FFD) [2] and power-aware bestfit decreasing (PABFD) [4] were proposed for VM placement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%