Enhancing Fluorescence LC Analysis of Biogenic Amines in Fish Tissues by Precolumn Derivatization with Naphthalene-2,3-dicarboxaldehyde

Zotou, Anastasia; Notou, Maria

doi:10.1007/s12161-012-9409-3

Cited by 15 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 61 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Colorimetric sensor arrays consisting either of several amine sensitive dyes [81] or organic liquid crystals [82] also have been applied for the determination of volatile amines in food and beverage samples. In this section several analytical procedures used for biogenic amines determination in wine [24,87,86,98] and fish samples [75,85,91,99] by application of different type of methods (GC, LC and CE), that are mentioned in this paper are assessed in respect to the green character. To evaluate these selected protocols, Analytical Eco-Scale was used.…”

Section: Gas Chromatographymentioning

confidence: 99%

Literature update of analytical methods for biogenic amines determination in food and beverages

Papageorgiou

Lambropoulou

Morrison

et al. 2018

TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry

243

165

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Biogenic amines (BAs) have been reported in a variety of foods, such as fish, meat, cheese, and wines. The formation of BAs in food by the microbial decarboxylation of amino acids can result in human allergic reactions, characterized by difficulty in breathing, rash, vomiting, and hypertension. Control measures to prevent biogenic amine formation in foods and/or reduce their levels should be considered. Therefore, monitoring of BAs in food samples with the application of analytical techniques is of high importance. This review is based on literature data from 2010 until today and refers to food samples and alcoholic beverages. The rationale of this study is to provide data for the occurrence of BAs in food and beverages samples and a comparison of the analytical techniques and challenges in liquid and solid matrices. Importantly, BAs can be used as future markers for quality and freshness of the food products and alcoholic beverages.

show abstract

Section: Gas Chromatographymentioning

confidence: 99%

Literature update of analytical methods for biogenic amines determination in food and beverages

Papageorgiou

Lambropoulou

Morrison

et al. 2018

TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry

243

165

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The LODs and LOQs of the proposed method are adequate for the safety control of food products, since they are much lower than the existing regulated limits of histamine, which range between 100-500 mg kg −1 [8,9]. In addition, they are comparable to the LODs and LOQs of other reported analytical methods of the same scope [17,26,27,[33][34][35]. The instrumental repeatability, the intra-and inter-day method precision data are given in Table 6.…”

Section: Calibrationmentioning

confidence: 63%

“…As a result, a number of analytical methods has been developed for the determination of BAs in foodstuff, including capillary electrophoresis (CE) [10][11][12], gas chromatography (GC) with mass spectrometric detection [13,14], ion chromatography with conductimetric and amperometric detection [15] and thin layer chromatography with densitometric scanning [16]. Amongst them, undoubtedly, the most widely applied analytical technique is liquid chromatography (LC) with ultraviolet absorbance (UV) [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25], or fluorescence detector (FLD) [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. The use of mass spectrometric detection is still relatively limited [37][38][39][40].…”

Section: Standards and Reagentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Due to the lack of chromophore or fluorophore groups in the most of the BAs structures, a pre-column [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]30,[33][34][35][36] or post-column [29,31,32] derivatization step is required.…”

Section: Standards and Reagentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The derivatization reagents tested for the liquid chromatographic determination of BAs include dialdehydes such as o-phthalaldehyde (OPA) [27,[29][30][31][32] and naphthalene-2,3-dicarboxaldehyde (NDA) [33], sulfonyl chlorides such as dansyl chloride (Dns-Cl) [17,19,25], dabsyl chloride (Dabs-Cl) [19,25] and 10-ethyl-acridine-3-sulfonyl chloride [19,26], benzoyl chloride [18,19,22,23], succinimidyl reagents like 6-aminoquinolyl-N-hydroxy-succinimidyl carbamate [21], N-(9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyloxy) succinimide (Fmoc-OSu) [36] and 1-pyrenebutanoic acid succinimidyl ester (PSE) [35], as well as diethyl ethoxymethylenemalonate [20,24].…”

Section: Standards and Reagentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Liquid Chromatographic Determination of Biogenic Amines in Fish Based on Pyrene Sulfonyl Chloride Pre-Column Derivatization

Plakidi

Maragou

Dasenaki

et al. 2020

Foods

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Monitoring of biogenic amines in food is important for quality control, in terms of freshness evaluation and even more for food safety. A novel and cost-effective method was developed and validated for the determination of the main biogenic amines: histamine, putrescine, cadaverine, spermidine and spermine in fish tissues. The method includes extraction of amines with perchloric acid, pre-column derivatization with Pyrene Sulfonyl Chloride (PSCl), extraction of derivatives with toluene, back-dissolution in ACN after evaporation and determination by reversed phase high performance liquid chromatography with UV and intramolecular excimer fluorescence detection. The structure of the pyrene-derivatives was confirmed by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry with electrospray ionization. The standard addition technique was applied for the quantitation due to significant matrix effect, while the use of 1,7-diaminoheptane as internal standard offered an additional confirmation tool for the identification of the analytes. Method repeatability expressed as %RSD ranged between 7.4–14% for the different amines and recovery ranged from 67% for histamine up to 114% for spermine. The limits of detection ranged between 0.1–1.4 mg kg−1 and the limits of quantification between 0.3–4.2 mg kg−1. The method was applied to canned fish samples and the concentrations of the individual biogenic amines were below the detection limit up to 40.1 mg kg−1, while their sum was within the range 4.1–49.6 mg kg−1.

show abstract

Simultaneous Determination of Seven Biogenic Amines in Foodstuff Samples Using One-Step Fluorescence Labeling and Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction Followed by HPLC-FLD and Method Optimization Using Response Surface Methodology

Liu

et al. 2014

Food Anal. Methods

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Enhancing Fluorescence LC Analysis of Biogenic Amines in Fish Tissues by Precolumn Derivatization with Naphthalene-2,3-dicarboxaldehyde

Cited by 15 publications

References 61 publications

Literature update of analytical methods for biogenic amines determination in food and beverages

Literature update of analytical methods for biogenic amines determination in food and beverages

Liquid Chromatographic Determination of Biogenic Amines in Fish Based on Pyrene Sulfonyl Chloride Pre-Column Derivatization

Simultaneous Determination of Seven Biogenic Amines in Foodstuff Samples Using One-Step Fluorescence Labeling and Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction Followed by HPLC-FLD and Method Optimization Using Response Surface Methodology

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About