2015
DOI: 10.1155/2015/905019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing Fluoride Mediated Dentine Sensitivity Relief through Functionalised Tricalcium Phosphate Activity

Abstract: Background. To assess the clinical efficacy of a dentifrice containing fluoride and functionalised tricalcium phosphate (fTCP) in reducing dentine sensitivity. Methods. A 10-week parallel blind randomised control trial was conducted. Subjects were assigned to one of four groups and instructed to brush twice daily: A: Colgate Cavity Protection (1000 ppmF-MFP); B: Sensodyne Total Care (1000 ppmF-NaF + 19300 ppmK+-KNO3); C: Clinpro Tooth Crème (950 ppmF-NaF + fTCP); and D: Clinpro Tooth Crème (brushing + addition… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies used a randomisation process involving a lottery method to allocate participants to the various groups [33], or used a computer-generated random table to ensure double blinding during the study [37] as well as using a list of random numbers sequentially from a Sponsor's Biostatistics Unit [38,[43][44][45][49][50][51]. The study by Naoum, et al [46] used a computer algorithm to limit the impact of age, gender, diet, and current level of oral hygiene on the study. The methodology used to maintain blinding during the study was not always clearly described in the studies, but it would be normal practice to overwrap the test and control dentifrices or have similar tubes/mouth rinses with labels with the assigned code (allocation concealment or masking) [18,33,37,38,43,50,51].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Other studies used a randomisation process involving a lottery method to allocate participants to the various groups [33], or used a computer-generated random table to ensure double blinding during the study [37] as well as using a list of random numbers sequentially from a Sponsor's Biostatistics Unit [38,[43][44][45][49][50][51]. The study by Naoum, et al [46] used a computer algorithm to limit the impact of age, gender, diet, and current level of oral hygiene on the study. The methodology used to maintain blinding during the study was not always clearly described in the studies, but it would be normal practice to overwrap the test and control dentifrices or have similar tubes/mouth rinses with labels with the assigned code (allocation concealment or masking) [18,33,37,38,43,50,51].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the included studies meet the guidelines in relation to the study duration ranging from six to 12 weeks (assessment at baseline, mid-point, end-point assessment). There were five studies of six weeks duration [24,30,33,36,48], one study of 10 weeks duration [46] two studies over 12 weeks duration [27,43] and 27 of studies of eight weeks duration [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][25][26]28,29,31,32,34,35,[37][38][39][40][41][42]44,45,47,[49][50][51].…”
Section: Durationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations