2021
DOI: 10.33828/sei.v32.i4.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing Science Process Skills Acquisition in Chemistry among Secondary School Students through Context-Based Learning

Abstract: The study examined the effect of Context Based Learning (CBL) and gender influence on chemistry students’ acquisition of Integrated Science Process Skills (ISPS). Two research questions guided the study. This study used a quasi-experimental research design with a sample of 192 participants who had an average age of 15. Three instruments were used in data collection. Data were analyzed using mean and standard deviation. The results showed that Context Based Learning (CBL) had more effect on students’ Integrated… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above findings concur with the findings of Ibe and Nwosu (2017), Achor et al, (2018), and Okoye and Osuafor (2021) who statistically reported in their respective studies in biology that innovative approaches similar to ELA promotes acquisition of SPS by students in biology. On a similar note, the above findings also support the findings of Okafor (2020) and Pius and Okoli (2021) who reported in their respective studies in chemistry that innovative approaches, such as context-based learning and problem-solving approach respectively, enhanced high school students' acquisition of SPS. In the same vein, studies carried out by Samba et al, (2020) and Mbonu-Adigwe et al, (2021) in basic science using E-learning and multimedia integrated instruction respectively also reported, in their findings, that both approaches enhanced students' acquisition of SPS concur with the discoveries of this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The above findings concur with the findings of Ibe and Nwosu (2017), Achor et al, (2018), and Okoye and Osuafor (2021) who statistically reported in their respective studies in biology that innovative approaches similar to ELA promotes acquisition of SPS by students in biology. On a similar note, the above findings also support the findings of Okafor (2020) and Pius and Okoli (2021) who reported in their respective studies in chemistry that innovative approaches, such as context-based learning and problem-solving approach respectively, enhanced high school students' acquisition of SPS. In the same vein, studies carried out by Samba et al, (2020) and Mbonu-Adigwe et al, (2021) in basic science using E-learning and multimedia integrated instruction respectively also reported, in their findings, that both approaches enhanced students' acquisition of SPS concur with the discoveries of this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Still, there is no consensus as to whether it affects students' acquisition of SPS or not. While some researchers (Ibe & Nwosu, 2017;Achor et al, 2018;Jack, 2018;Okoye & Osuafor, 2021;Pius & Okoli, 2021) in their respective studies in different science subjects reported that male students have higher science process skills than the female students, others (Okafor, 2020;Mbonu-Adigwe et al, 2021) in their study in chemistry and basic science respectively reported that female students have higher science process skills than their male counterparts. However, when statistically tested, the same group of researchers (Ibe & Nwosu, 2017;Achor et al, 2018;Jack, 2018;Okafor, 2020;Okoye & Osuafor, 2021;Pius & Okoli, 2021;Mbonu-Adigwe et al, 2021) have statistically reported in their respective studies that gender influence on students SPS acquisition in science subjects is insignificant.…”
Section: 54392/ajir2243mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study conducted by Yuniskurin et al (2019) demonstrates that females have superior spelling abilities and outperform males in assessments of literacy, writing, and general knowledge within the field of Education. Ekon and Eni (2015) and Okafor (2021) demonstrated that women were underrepresented and had lower levels of accomplishment in science and technology than men.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Underlying scientific and psychological features of the developed laboratory manual aided in the gain of SPS since the intervention is of relevance to the learners' means of living. Literature has a handful of accounts testifying to the effectiveness of context-based instruction and its allies, like culture-based approach and indigenization, in the development of conceptual understanding [31][32] [33] as well as SPS attainment [34][35] [36]. Science learning should not simply revolve around knowledge construction but must also target the recalibration of actions and behaviors, indirectly connoting the importance of SPS development [37].…”
Section: Level Of Science Process Skills Before and After The Impleme...mentioning
confidence: 99%