2019
DOI: 10.31209/2019.100000152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing the Classification Accuracy in Sentiment Analysis with Computational Intelligence using Joint Sentiment Topic Detection with MEDLDA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is expected that the produced topics are dependent on the sentiment distributions and that the generated words are conditional on the sentiment topic pairings. Thus, a weakly supervised joint sentiment-topic mode may be utilized to improve the accuracy of topic modeling by extending the maximum entropy discrimination latent Dirichlet allocation (MEDLDA) topic model [ 86 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is expected that the produced topics are dependent on the sentiment distributions and that the generated words are conditional on the sentiment topic pairings. Thus, a weakly supervised joint sentiment-topic mode may be utilized to improve the accuracy of topic modeling by extending the maximum entropy discrimination latent Dirichlet allocation (MEDLDA) topic model [ 86 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KDD has been a research hotspot in modern biomedicine field for many years, but its application in TCM has been highlighted in recent years [1][2][3][4][21][22][23]. Lukman et al [24] surveyed the progress of computational approaches for TCM formulation and diagnosis mining.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 4 points out the different evaluation parameters used in the reviewed studies, as well as the time frame of the prediction. For the most part, the studies used accuracy as an evaluation metric, which is the percentage ratio of correct predictions over the total number of test instances [146].…”
Section: Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%