2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.01.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing the effectiveness of prewhitening in trend analysis of hydrologic data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
138
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
138
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Before performing these analyses, whether the lag-1 correlation is significantly different from 0 at the 5% level is checked. The presence of autocorrelation can affect the significance of the trend tests (Kulkarni and von Storch, 1995;Yue et al, 2003;Yue and Wang, 2004;Hamed, 2009), resulting in the detection of statistically significant trends even though no trend is present (Cox and Stuart, 1955;Cohn and Lins, 2005). Out of 27 stations, only one has a lag-1 value slightly outside of the 95% confidence intervals.…”
Section: Stationaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before performing these analyses, whether the lag-1 correlation is significantly different from 0 at the 5% level is checked. The presence of autocorrelation can affect the significance of the trend tests (Kulkarni and von Storch, 1995;Yue et al, 2003;Yue and Wang, 2004;Hamed, 2009), resulting in the detection of statistically significant trends even though no trend is present (Cox and Stuart, 1955;Cohn and Lins, 2005). Out of 27 stations, only one has a lag-1 value slightly outside of the 95% confidence intervals.…”
Section: Stationaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To mitigate this impact, some efforts focus on adjusting the original test to the auto-correlated data, commonly a pre-whitening (PW) approach, trend-free pre-whitening (TFPW). However, these approaches may be inadequate to analyze real data because of the high variance of slope estimators [27]. These problems were solving by involving the correction of both the slope and serial variances in the original TFPW approach, Variance Correction Pre-Whitening Method.…”
Section: Variance Correction Pre-whitening Mann-kendall Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rejection Ratio " N rej {10000 " tType I error, β " 0; Power, β ‰ 0u (19) where N rej is the number of samples that the null hypothesis is rejected by the test. We set the pre-assigned significance level to 0.05.…”
Section: Simulation Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recognizing these disadvantages, Bayazit and Önöz [18] suggested that PW is not suitable in the case of large sample sizes and strong trends. Hamed [19] improved the PW approach by correcting the bias in the estimation of the lag-one autocorrelation coefficient and carefully selecting the autocorrelation model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%