2007
DOI: 10.5751/es-01976-120128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing the Fit through Adaptive Co-management: Creating and Maintaining Bridging Functions for Matching Scales in the Kristianstads Vattenrike Biosphere Reserve, Sweden

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
317
1
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 359 publications
(323 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
2
317
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Initially introduced by Cash and Moser (Cash & Moser 2000) as boarding organizations designed to mediate the linkages between researchers and decision makers, the term bridging organization now typically encompasses any organization that bridges local actors and communities with other organizational levels (Olsson et al 2007). Bridging organizations provide valuable links between actors with various interests and worldviews (Olsson et al 2007;Berkes 2009;Börzel & Buzogány 2010). Bridging organizations thus provide an arena for building social capital through fostering trust, learning, vertical and horizontal collaboration, and conflict resolution (Folke et al 2005).…”
Section: Cooperation Among Stakeholders Needs To Increasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially introduced by Cash and Moser (Cash & Moser 2000) as boarding organizations designed to mediate the linkages between researchers and decision makers, the term bridging organization now typically encompasses any organization that bridges local actors and communities with other organizational levels (Olsson et al 2007). Bridging organizations provide valuable links between actors with various interests and worldviews (Olsson et al 2007;Berkes 2009;Börzel & Buzogány 2010). Bridging organizations thus provide an arena for building social capital through fostering trust, learning, vertical and horizontal collaboration, and conflict resolution (Folke et al 2005).…”
Section: Cooperation Among Stakeholders Needs To Increasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Panarchy allows us to reconceptualize socialecological systems in a manner that has the capacity to better match governance to the environment. Matching governance and ecosystems is a persistent problem , Olsson et al 2007) that requires aspects of adaptive management, adaptive governance, and reflexive mechanisms, e.g., monitoring and iteration of policy. For example, characterizing the responsibilities of management agencies, that is, local, state, regional, national, and international, for the Florida Bay at a variety of scales provides us with a better understanding of the "fit" between governance and the environment.…”
Section: Example: Florida Baymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past decade, the scale concept has been increasingly introduced into the field of natural resource management (Lovell et al 2002;Adger et al 2005;Berkes 2006;Borgström et al 2006;Young 2006;Biggs et al 2007;Olsson et al 2007;Papaik et al 2008). Large-scale social and ecological systems consist of subsystems at smaller scales, and changes that occur at a given focal scale may have unexpected impacts at larger and smaller scales (Pelosi et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%