Enhancing the Future of Vulnerability Theory

Zakour, Michael J.; Gillespie, David F.

doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5737-4_10

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 91 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Table 1 -Glossary from my Ph.D. thesis resuming key components of the "anatomy of vulnerability" (Davis, 2014). Main analytical references: Pressure and Release (PAR) model (Blaikie et al, 2004;Davis, 1978), Disaster Crunch model (Davis, 2014), Progression of Safety (Blaikie et al, 2004;Wisner et al, 2012), the roadmap to hell (Wisner et al, 2012), the Disaster Risk Process Approach (Narváez et al, 2009), Vulnerability-Plus Theory (Zakour & Gillespie, 2013;Zakour & Swager, 2018) and the Forensic Investigation of disaster (FORIN project) methodology (Oliver-Smith et al, 2016).…”

Section: Theoretical and Analytical Referencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Orienting Flood Risk Management to Disaster Risk Creation: lessons from the Water Framework Directive

Cazzola

2022

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Theoretical and Analytical Referencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Orienting Flood Risk Management to Disaster Risk Creation: lessons from the Water Framework Directive

Cazzola

2022

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Climate-Related Vulnerability Assessment Toward Disaster Risk Reduction: Insight from Pakistan

Abbas,

Guo

2023

Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Globally, climate-related disasters (CRDs) have become a common phenomenon in the last few decades, increasing vulnerability and causing disaster mortality. To manage disaster risk, the global Sendai Framework for disaster risk reduction (SFDRR) provides a solid action plan for disaster risk reduction (DRR) considering all the dimensions of vulnerability. However, countries are still less receptive at the local level to adopting the SFDRR. Also, the global research community did not explore vulnerability features based on the Sendai Framework nor integrated such features with the four priorities of SFDRR. Based on the case of Pakistan, this study seeks to bridge the gap through three objectives. The first objective of the study is to identify the vulnerability features cited in the SFDRR. In addition, the research aims to develop a new vulnerability model by integrating SFDRR’s four priorities. As a second objective, it is intended to develop a decision support framework for ranking and evaluating each of the SFDRR priority action areas under local conditions. A third objective is to assess the impact of climate-induced environmental, socioeconomic and political vulnerabilities on climate-driven mortality. To meet these three different objectives, the authors have adopted a multi-method approach by using multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) and binary logistic regression method (BLRM). Based on the assessment, the authors suggested some policy implications.

show abstract

Enhancing the Future of Vulnerability Theory

Cited by 2 publications

References 91 publications

Orienting Flood Risk Management to Disaster Risk Creation: lessons from the Water Framework Directive

Orienting Flood Risk Management to Disaster Risk Creation: lessons from the Water Framework Directive

Climate-Related Vulnerability Assessment Toward Disaster Risk Reduction: Insight from Pakistan

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About