2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12546-014-9123-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entering first union: the choice between cohabitation and marriage among women in Italy and Spain

Abstract: While in Spain and Italy cohabitation has not acquired the same role that it has had in Northern Europe, in both of these Mediterranean countries cohabitation is no longer a marginal phenomenon. Moreover, the nature of cohabiting couples is diverse. According to the most recent FFS data, first cohabitations constitute a temporary arrangement that usually ends in the formalization of the union (marriage), and within 5 years 28.9 % of first cohabitations in Spain and 51.7 % in Italy were transformed into marriag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Now, to proceed to the discussion of the main results of the article, our findings on cohabitation indicate rejection of the legal procedure which persists even when decisions involving children must be taken. As for SES, our results mirror the findings of García-Pereiro et al (2014) regarding union formation. Their results indicate that the higher the SES the more likely women are to prefer a cohabiting union to marriage, while women in the low SES group are more likely to get married.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Now, to proceed to the discussion of the main results of the article, our findings on cohabitation indicate rejection of the legal procedure which persists even when decisions involving children must be taken. As for SES, our results mirror the findings of García-Pereiro et al (2014) regarding union formation. Their results indicate that the higher the SES the more likely women are to prefer a cohabiting union to marriage, while women in the low SES group are more likely to get married.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…First, the research confirms the necessity of "bringing back the men" into the picture and taking a truly two-sided analysis of marriage and cohabitation (Kalmijn 2011;Pereiro, Pace, and Didonna 2014). Qualitative data on representations and motivations underlying the choice of non-marital cohabitation, and how they differ by gender, would be particularly valuable at this stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The existing evidence from Western countries also suggests that unmarried conception and the birth of a child is an important factor in the analysis of the choice between marriage and cohabitation. Previous research shows that pregnancy and childbearing precipitate both marriage and cohabitation and that the effect is more pronounced in the transition to marriage, especially in countries or among social groups where the pressure to give birth within marriage is strong (Brien, Lillard, and Waite 1999;Gabrielli and Hoem 2010;Hoem and Kostova 2008;Agadjanian and Dommaraju 2011;Pereiro, Pace, and Didonna 2014). In Burkina Faso, although conception and birth outside formal unions are on the rise in urban areas, childbearing remains strongly associated with marriage plans (Calvès and Gnoumou Thiombiano 2014).…”
Section: Factors Affecting the Choice Between Marriage And Unmarried mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An elegant explanation of the Fine and Gray model has been published in another study [35]. While its application has mostly been in medical and epidemiological research, its application in studying population processes such as fertility, mortality, and family formation has also been increasing [36][37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%