2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.06.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enterovesical fistula, a rare complication of Meckel’s diverticulum: A case report

Abstract: HighlightsRare complication of meckel disease.The urinary symptoms are the main revealing table.Despite the various investigations done, the diagnosis was carried out, in all the reported cases, in per-operatory.The treatment of the vescoentericfistula is surgical in all cases. A diverticulectomy and a suture of the bladder fistula were carried out in all the reported cases.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are few reports of an EVF associated with Meckel diverticulum. A PubMed and Embase search for articles published between 1990 and 2018 using terms of “enterovesical fistula,” “vesicoenteric fistula,” and “Meckel’s diverticulum” identified seven cases of fistula in the English literature [ 1 - 6 , 12 ]. The causes were no coexisting bowel or bladder disease (3 cases), adenocarcinoma in ectopic pancreatic tissue (1 case), Crohn disease (1 case), enterolith (1 case), and ingested foreign body in Meckel diverticulum (1 case) ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are few reports of an EVF associated with Meckel diverticulum. A PubMed and Embase search for articles published between 1990 and 2018 using terms of “enterovesical fistula,” “vesicoenteric fistula,” and “Meckel’s diverticulum” identified seven cases of fistula in the English literature [ 1 - 6 , 12 ]. The causes were no coexisting bowel or bladder disease (3 cases), adenocarcinoma in ectopic pancreatic tissue (1 case), Crohn disease (1 case), enterolith (1 case), and ingested foreign body in Meckel diverticulum (1 case) ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%