Enterprise 2.0 Integrated Communication and Collaboration Platform: A Conceptual Viewpoint

Polaschek, Martin L.; Zeppelzauer, Wolfgang; Kryvinska, Natalia; Strauß, Christine

doi:10.1109/waina.2012.73

Cited by 18 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The efficiency is dependent on the right enterprise collaboration. The enterprises are facing challenges in finding the appropriate technology solutions [9].The technology trends we mentioned provides many ways of interaction between an organization and its customers, hence bringing new forms of collaboration.…”

Section: Discussion On Soa Technology Trendsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comparison Framework for SOA Maturity Models

Pulparambil

Baghdadi

2015

2015 IEEE International Conference on Smart City/SocialCom/SustainCom (SmartCity)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SOA is an architectural style for both business and IT. SOA adoption is a gradual process and has different levels. These can be referred as SOA maturity levels and represented through SOA maturity models (SOA MM). The paper focuses on SOA MM whose importance has already been realized by industry, as a result we have many maturity models from both industry and academia. However, each of these models address different aspects of SOA and an enterprise may not be able to choose the adequate one. This paper presents a comparison framework by considering the important elements of SOA and their influence in SOA MM. This paper also focuses on prominent trends in SOA and the additional dimensions that SOA MMs needs to consider. The framework is useful to: (i) understand the strong link of SOA MM and enterprise SOA adoption, (ii) identify how far the existing models considers the important SOA parameters, (iii) analyze the gaps in the SOA MM they are adopted (if any), (iv) model or expand SOA MM specific to an enterprise, and (v) understand the influence of recent technology trends in SOA and their roles in SOA MM.

show abstract

Section: Discussion On Soa Technology Trendsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comparison Framework for SOA Maturity Models

Pulparambil

Baghdadi

2015

2015 IEEE International Conference on Smart City/SocialCom/SustainCom (SmartCity)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The intensification of collaborative work practices, the wide adoption of mobile applications, the advent of pervasive Business Intelligence Systems and Social Computing have urged the introduction of a new management paradigm [37] and can be reported as some of the contemporary 'erosion factors' that intensify the need to consider the notion of openness more seriously. We started this paper with questioning how effectively existing technological platforms address emergent collaboration and innovation practices within and among organizations in the different sectors of the economy with a special emphasis on the coupled process within the open innovation paradigm.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For instance, even though enterprise social platforms provide a wide variety of organizational collaborative functions, some of which are indeed very sophisticated, they are reported to have serious limitations in that they mainly take the form of standalone wikis, social software suites, and enterprise collaboration software [37] that operate on the intraorganizational level. Although open innovation as a new paradigm encourages the active involvement of different stakeholders in the making of products and services, what we mainly witness is the use of isolated 'spaces' and tools designed specifically for each relevant group.…”

Section: The Role Of Collaborative Technologies In Promoting Open Innmentioning

confidence: 99%

Designing an Integrated Open Innovation System

Baka

2014

Proceedings of the International Symposium on Open Collaboration

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Increasing use of collaborative technologies has transformed organizational dynamics in novel ways. In this paper, we adopt the principle of wholeness in designing an integrated open innovation system. We provide an overview of existing collaborative technologies and situate the proposed sociotechnical arrangement within the paradigm of open innovation. We explore how effectively technological platforms address emergent collaboration and innovation practices within and across organizations and to which extent existing technologies act as strategic catalysts of open innovation. We argue that in embracing wholeness and in treating technologies as inseparable constitutive parts of organizational architecture, we foster organizational and institutional collaboration and encourage innovative practices. The focus of the paper is on how the design of sociotechnical systems as wholes, that is systems that are concurrently acting as corporate websites, internal collaboration spaces, extranets and social media aggregators, actively promotes open innovation in practice. We close with a presentation of six cases that are illustrative of how such a system could be applicable within the open innovation paradigm, namely, citizen participation, crowdsourcing and open innovation contests, open source innovation, reviews and social media, social enterprises and open teaching.

show abstract

“…The project camera is potentially a useful tool that could be integrated into PM 2.0 platforms as well. Web 2.0 tools can only be effectively used if they are integrated together under a single interface (Polaschek, et al 2012).…”

Section: Project Management Featuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Social Media Platforms for Construction Project Management

Rawalai¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

<p>There is a need for all stakeholders of building process to interact efficiently and effectively. However, this is not always possible due to the different knowledge background and complexity of building projects. Technologies transfer communication, leadership, democratic interaction, teamwork, social engagement and responsibility away from the instructors to the participants. Implementing social network-enabled communication can move design and production beyond its conventional realm and enables stakeholders to develop architectural, management and production knowledge that is embedded into a community of experts with their expertise both online and offline. Current media tools that are available need to be adopted and optimized to match the specific tasks of project delivery. The current single communication tools don’t allow the inclusion of all stakeholders and don’t support a social and collaborative project environment. Communication management is a crucial knowledge area for Project Managers (PMs) who are expected to effectively and efficiently communicate the four constraints (Scope, Time, Cost, Quality) of a project to other stakeholders. This thesis explores the concept of using social media (SM) for construction project management (CPM) and in supporting collaboration within construction project teams. This thesis employs the research methods of a Literature Review, Survey, and a Software Review to achieve this. The literature review identified that there was a knowledge gap regarding SM use by PMs. While construction industry professionals recognised a need for SM, there were no strategies in place to capitalise on SM use. Current tools being used by construction PMs as identified in this thesis include, web-based project management software (WPMS) and Social Software/Groupware. Both tools are used to support core PM processes while also providing a collaborative electronic workspace on the Internet. The emergence of Project Management 2.0 (PM 2.0) and Social Project Management (SPM) methodology/Software as a response to Web 2.0, has seen the adaptation of the social networking (SN) and the ‘re-tweet’ paradigm in project communities. Currently there are SPM software available which is being largely used by PMs in the information technology (IT) industry. A Survey which was administered online to industry professionals, showed that survey respondents while dubious about the use of SM for project related work were interested in using software that integrated more SM-like features. The survey further identified that survey respondents were not aware of SPM software but that they were using some semblance of Social software which were akin to SPM. The dissertation presented a review of current state-of-the-art SPM software and was also used to identify core PM features. In addition to this, ten SPM software were reviewed for features that were fundamentally Web 2.0/ SM based. The findings from the software review and literature review is finally culminated in the outline of the conceptual SPM software-Gantt 2.0 which is intended for CPM.</p>

show abstract

Enterprise 2.0 Integrated Communication and Collaboration Platform: A Conceptual Viewpoint

Cited by 18 publications

References 9 publications

A Comparison Framework for SOA Maturity Models

A Comparison Framework for SOA Maturity Models

Designing an Integrated Open Innovation System

Social Media Platforms for Construction Project Management

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About