2003
DOI: 10.1080/0953728031000096557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enterprise waste evaluation using the analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy set theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was followed by combining the expert opinions by introducing Fuzzy Delphi Method; this process is called FDAHP (Fuzzy Delphi Analytic Hierarchy Process) that's used to solve and sequence the fuzzy weights of various factors. Nevertheless, Rong et al [12] suggested that, since the key success factors obtained from FDAHP are expressed semantically, it is not objective to evaluate the packages according to the subjective significance of factors. So, the significance of quantitative factors of various dimensions was arranged by grey relational analysis after important factors were selected by FDAHP; in the event of conflict between evaluation results and FDAHP, the decision-makers Downloaded by [RMIT University Library] at 21:10 16 June 2016 could rearrange the significance according to grey relational analysis, with the major analytic processes shown below.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was followed by combining the expert opinions by introducing Fuzzy Delphi Method; this process is called FDAHP (Fuzzy Delphi Analytic Hierarchy Process) that's used to solve and sequence the fuzzy weights of various factors. Nevertheless, Rong et al [12] suggested that, since the key success factors obtained from FDAHP are expressed semantically, it is not objective to evaluate the packages according to the subjective significance of factors. So, the significance of quantitative factors of various dimensions was arranged by grey relational analysis after important factors were selected by FDAHP; in the event of conflict between evaluation results and FDAHP, the decision-makers Downloaded by [RMIT University Library] at 21:10 16 June 2016 could rearrange the significance according to grey relational analysis, with the major analytic processes shown below.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the key success factors obtained from FDAHP are expressed by semantics, evaluating the packages via the subjective significance of factors is not objective (Rong et al [12]). Thus, the qualitative data are applied to sequencing of success factors with FDAHP, and then actual quantitative data of optimal factors are applied to modify the sequence of important FDAHP factors through Gray Sequencing, thereby giving full consideration of the sequence of qualitative and quantitative success factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partial disassembly and then forwarding of recyclable materials to the local market with the remainder deposed at landfill sites appeared as the best option and thus selected. Rong et al 14 proposed a method for enterprise waste evaluation that combines the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and fuzzy set theory and establishes a three-step procedure consisting of evaluation, clustering and ranking. First, a waste evaluation index system is established using the AHP so that the harmfulness of each type of waste can be measured systematically and the more harmful waste sources could be identified.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Waste reduction, therefore, is the priority of the JIT supply chain. The entire JIT concept consists based on the philosophy underpinning waste identification and its elimination (Karlsson and Ahlstrom, 1996;Rong et al, 2003). Waste allocation and elimination have recently become an important field of research.…”
Section: Science Publicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%