Enterprises’ national innovation system performance in Egypt, Côte d’Ivoire and Cameroon

Aklobo, M. Samson C.; Ahodode, Bernadin G. C.

doi:10.1080/2157930x.2022.2127638

“…In exploring the issue of measuring the technological innovation performance of enterprises, it is widely recognised in academia and industry that there is no globally standardised evaluation system due to the complexity and variability of the technological innovation process (Sarsen et al, 2023). Existing evaluation systems generally have the following limitations: first, the distinction between inputs and outputs is not clear enough, often overemphasising inputs of resources and neglecting the substantive benefits of innovation outputs (Zhang and Aumeboonsuke, 2022); second, evaluation systems tend to measure technological product innovation and underassess the contribution of technological process innovation (Amponsah and Novák, 2022); and furthermore, most of the existing indicators focus on short-term results and lack the consideration of continuity and depth of the innovation process (Aklobo and Ahodode, 2022).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

2024

SJEF

0

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study addresses the special characteristics and limitations of Chinese enterprises in innovation performance evaluation, and analyzes in depth the unique needs and challenges of these enterprises in the process of technological innovation. By comparing relevant research and practices at home and abroad, this paper proposes a comprehensive set of enterprise technology innovation performance evaluation index system. This study not only helps the management of enterprises to formulate and adjust their technological innovation strategies, but also promotes the improvement of their internal innovation mechanism and culture. In this way, enterprises can allocate and utilize resources more effectively, optimize products and services, and ultimately enhance their overall technological innovation capability and market competitiveness. The enterprise technological innovation performance evaluation index system constructed in this study not only provides a practical technological innovation evaluation tool for enterprises, but also provides policy makers and academics with a new perspective and methodology for studying enterprise technological innovation. This will help promote the continuous development and progress of Chinese enterprises in technological innovation.

show abstract

“…In exploring the issue of measuring the technological innovation performance of enterprises, it is widely recognised in academia and industry that there is no globally standardised evaluation system due to the complexity and variability of the technological innovation process (Sarsen et al, 2023). Existing evaluation systems generally have the following limitations: first, the distinction between inputs and outputs is not clear enough, often overemphasising inputs of resources and neglecting the substantive benefits of innovation outputs (Zhang and Aumeboonsuke, 2022); second, evaluation systems tend to measure technological product innovation and underassess the contribution of technological process innovation (Amponsah and Novák, 2022); and furthermore, most of the existing indicators focus on short-term results and lack the consideration of continuity and depth of the innovation process (Aklobo and Ahodode, 2022).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Digital Financial Development and Corporate Innovation

XU RUYUE,

Benjamin Chan

2024

SJEF

0

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over the last 10 years, digital banking has grown fast thanks to digital technologies such as big data, cloud computing, and blockchain. Its broad reach, low cost, and low threshold have the potential to boost innovation. Based on this backdrop, this paper investigates the impact and mechanism of digital financing on corporate innovation using data from China’s A-share listed businesses from 2012 to 2022. At the same time, the institutional environment is employed as a regulatory variable to further investigate the link between digital finance and business innovation to encourage Digital finance is better for the actual economy.

show abstract