2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0925-8388(00)01509-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enthalpy measurements of the solid high-temperature β-phase of titanium and zirconium by levitation drop calorimetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We obtained a value of heat of fusion of zirconium ∆H f us ≈ 14 kJ/mol by QMD. Our calculations tend to the lower values of the enthalpy of melting measured by rapid pulse heating [78][79][80] and drop calorimetry [90,98,100] (12.8-21.5 kJ/mol).…”
Section: Enthalpymentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We obtained a value of heat of fusion of zirconium ∆H f us ≈ 14 kJ/mol by QMD. Our calculations tend to the lower values of the enthalpy of melting measured by rapid pulse heating [78][79][80] and drop calorimetry [90,98,100] (12.8-21.5 kJ/mol).…”
Section: Enthalpymentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Above 273.15 K and up to the α-β transition temperature, the Douglas and Victor [87] enthalpy measurements (373-1124 K) were adopted after a correction to the International Temperature Scale of 1990 (ITS-90 is an approximation of the thermodynamic temperature scale that facilitates comparability and compatibility of temperature measurements internationally). Before melting, specific heat measurements of Cezairliyan and Righini [88] (1500-2100K) and Petrova et al [89] (1200-2100 K) were combined with the drop calorimetry enthalpy measurements of Rösner-Kuhnetal et al [90] (1821-2105 K).…”
Section: Enthalpymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the levitation drop calorimetry experiment in ref. [21], the emissivity ε T =0.294 was substituted into eq. ( 5) [11].…”
Section: Density and Specific Heatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that weights determined by the automated weighting procedure described in section 3.1 are relatively insensitive to each other and, perhaps more surprisingly, to fluctuations in the model's parameterization. Looking at the values of the hyperparameters themselves, we can see that the Bayesian framework highly weights the measurements of Korobenko [63], Cagran [64] and Rösner-Kuhn [65] while assigning the measurements of Paradis [66] a low weight. Figures 3 and 4, which display the model predictions and experimental data sets confirm that the model prediction aligns closely with the prioritized data sets while effectively ignoring the Paradis measurements.…”
Section: Case Study: Hafniummentioning
confidence: 99%