Entitlement Attitudes Questionnaire

Żemojtel‐Piotrowska, Magdalena; Piotrowski, Jarosław; Cieciuch, Jan; Calogero, Rachel M.; Hiel, Alain Van; Argentero, Piergiorgio; Bălţătescu, Sergiu; Baran, Tomasz; Bardhwaj, Gopa; Bukowski, Marcin; Chargazia, Melania; Clinton, Amanda; Halik, Murnizam; Iliško, Dzintra; Khachatryan, Narine; Klicperová‐Baker, Martina; Košťál, Jaroslav; Kovács, Mónika; Letovancova, Eva; Liik, Kadi; Marganski, Alison; Michałowski, Jarosław M.; Nord, Iwo; Paspalanova, Elena; León, Pablo Pérez de; Techera, José; Rojas, Mariano; Różycka, Joanna; Sawicka, Aleksandra; Seibt, Beate; Semkiv, Iryna; Tiliouine, Habib; Truong, Ha Khanh; Bos, Kees van den; Wills-Herrera, Eduardo

doi:10.1037/t64350-000

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This suggests that we cannot compare means, but we can compare correlations between phubbing and other variables across the countries (Milfont & Fischer, 2010). However, it should be noted that scalar invariance is difficult to achieve, as researchers often mention (Gallardo-Pujol et al, 2019;Laguna et al, 2017;Żemojtel-Piotrowska et al, 2018). We, however, have established full scalar (strong) invariance across genders.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measurement invariance of the Phubbing Scale across 20 countries

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

M obile phone addiction is a robust phenomenon observed throughout the world. The social aspect of mobile phone use is crucial; therefore, phubbing is a part of the mobile phone addiction phenomenon. Phubbing is defined as ignoring an interlocutor by glancing at one's mobile phone during a face-to-face conversation. The main aim of this study was to investigate how the Phubbing Scale (containing 10 items) might vary across countries, and between genders. Data were collected in 20 countries: Belarus,

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measurement invariance of the Phubbing Scale across 20 countries

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Participants answered questions on the scale with scores ranging from 1 or completely disagree to 6 or completely agree. The scale has proven reliability and validity (Piotrowski & Żemojtel-Piotrowska, 2009;Żemojtel-Piotrowska et al, 2015b). Cronbach's α reliabilities of active, passive and revenge entitlement were, respectively, .80, .90, .81 in Poland, .72, .63, .80 in Puerto Rico, and .67, .67, .81 in Vietnam.…”

Section: Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Entitlement. Entitlement attitudes were measured by the Entitlement Questionnaire -Short Form(Żemojtel-Piotrowska et al, 2015b…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Entitlement and subjective well-being: a three-nations study

Żemojtel‐Piotrowska¹,

Piotrowski²,

Clinton³

et al. 2015

Health Psychology Report

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

health psychology report • volume 3(2), 5 original article background The current study investigated the role of three facets of entitlement (active, passive and revenge) in various forms of subjective well-being (SWB): hedonistic and two facets of eudaimonic well-being (social and psychological). Social well-being was based on Keyes' model (1998) and psychological well-being on Ryff's model (1989).

show abstract

“…The scale has been implemented in over 38 countries (Macintosh, 1998) including Canada (Helmes et al, 2010;Maitland et al, 2001;Mcdowell & Praught, 1982), England (Harding, 1982;van Schuur & Kruijtbosch, 1995), Holland (Kempen, 1992), Poland (Żemojtel-Piotrowska et al, 2013, and the United States (Moriwaki, 1974), among others. The scale is designed for different ages, ranging from adolescents (Żemojtel-Piotrowska et al, 2013) to elderly adults (Himmelfarb & Murrell, 1983;Kempen, 1992;Liang, 1985;Moriwaki, 1974). As the original author suggested, the confirmatory analyses support the two-dimensional factorial structure (CFI > .96; RMSEA < .06) (Helmes et al, 2010;Kim & Mueller, 2001).…”

Section: Psychological Thoughtmentioning

confidence: 83%

The Affect Balance Scale (Abs): Psychometric Properties in Argentina

Simkin

Warter

Hoffmann

2021

PSYCT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Affect Balance Scale (ABS) was developed to assess the affective component of subjective well-being. This study aims to evaluate the psychometric properties of ABS in a non-probabilistic sample composed of 2241 individuals in the general population in Argentina, ages ranging from 18 to 89 years (M = 37.53; SD = 14.80). The results suggest acceptable psychometric properties within the sample. Excellent adjustment to the data of the two-dimensional model is observed through confirmatory factor analysis. Results of the factorial invariance analysis of gender conducted indicate that both groups are equivalent in terms of the factor structure under investigation. Internal consistency was also found to be adequate. As a result, the study contributed to assessing positive and negative affect in Spanish speaking populations.

show abstract

Entitlement Attitudes Questionnaire

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Measurement invariance of the Phubbing Scale across 20 countries

Measurement invariance of the Phubbing Scale across 20 countries

Entitlement and subjective well-being: a three-nations study

The Affect Balance Scale (Abs): Psychometric Properties in Argentina

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About