Entrepreneurial ecosystems: a dynamic lifecycle model

Cantner, Uwe; Cunningham, James A.; Lehmann, Erik E.; Menter, Matthias

doi:10.1007/s11187-020-00316-0

Cited by 164 publications

(133 citation statements)

References 108 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

125

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…For the development of internal entrepreneurship, it is necessary to create a certain environment, or even an ecosystem in a company [9,17,20,21]. The results of our research confirm the data of previous research on the importance of creating a supportive environment that includes, among other things, financial mechanisms, decision-making procedures, motivational and internal communication systems, and an innovative corporate culture.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 84%

Development of Entrepreneurial Competencies of Employees within the Framework of internal Entrepreneurship Programs in the Region

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The global economic environment is becoming more active and complex. Technological and social changes affect the internal processes of companies associated with the diversification of production, the introduction of new lines of products and services, the modernization of business processes. In this article, the authors present the results of a study into the ways ten large industrial companies (fuel, chemical and petrochemical, food industry, defence industry and agricultural technology) in the Omsk region develop domestic internal entrepreneurship. As a result of narrative interviews with HR directors of the selected companies, the authors formulated two approaches to the development of internal entrepreneurship. The first method is based on the development of a creative environment that stimulates the generation of initiatives to improve business. The second method involves companies implementing business projects through employee development programs. The advantages and disadvantages of both methods are subsequently highlighted. The conclusions draw attention to the problems of the development of internal entrepreneurship within large industrial companies and the need to create a special environment and infrastructure to promote the business initiatives of employees.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 84%

Development of Entrepreneurial Competencies of Employees within the Framework of internal Entrepreneurship Programs in the Region

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Entrepreneurial ecosystems result from a combination of several factors, processes and agents with placed dynamics. The Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Taxonomy illustrates that EI determinants differ between groups, which contributed to capture the dynamic nature of entrepreneurial ecosystems [72] through its quality. More work is required to theoretically consolidate the EET approach and to expand the model with existing theories, as suggested by Wurth et al [17].…”

Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Entrepreneurial Initiative: Building a Multi-Country Taxonomy

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The main goal of this article is to appraise the existence of different patterns of the Entrepreneurial Ecosystems, to identify its relationship with Entrepreneurial Initiative, and recommend entrepreneurship policies that may influence the growth of entrepreneurial action. Without evidence on entrepreneurial ecosystems landscape and what determinants stimulate entrepreneurship in a given environment, policies could become flawed and miss the target. To address research purposes, the analysis was performed using data extracted from the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) Database carried out between 2010 and 2016. To ensure a longitudinal perspective, it was used a balanced panel approach followed by Logistic Regression estimations. The article offers a novel and systematic approach, the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Taxonomy, to overcome a disaggregated perspective on entrepreneurial ecosystems, between individual and context levels. Empirical findings capture four different country profiles, based on two measures: Entrepreneurial ecosystems and entrepreneurial initiative. The results allow to compare the four groups and appraise significant disparities around entrepreneurship determinants, namely, the education factor. While education is commonly recognized as a positive influence on entrepreneurship, the results suggest a contradictory effect. The existence of differentiated profiles and its determinants points outs the importance of developing specific entrepreneurship policy packages attending group specificities.

show abstract

“…Examining how BS-industry linkages are harnessed to support AE and what factors and motivations drive and sustain BS-industry linkages that support AE would be illuminating. Taking an entrepreneurial ecosystem and or stakeholder perspective would be a fruitful avenue to explore (Cantner et al 2020;McAdam, Miller, and McAdam 2016).…”

Section: Entrepreneurial Networkmentioning

confidence: 99%

What business schools do to support academic entrepreneurship: a systematic literature review and future research agenda

Walsh

Cunningham

Mordue

et al. 2021

Studies in Higher Education

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The literature on academic entrepreneurship within business schools is limited and fragmented. The purpose of this systematic literature review is to address this deficit and to identify what business schools do to support academic entrepreneurship and to outline a future research agenda. Based on our systematic literature review we identified three main themes that business schools do to support academic entrepreneurship namely: entrepreneurial education; entrepreneurial networks; and entrepreneurial ecosystems. Furthermore, we identified two further embryonic themes, individual level factors and obstacles to entrepreneurship. Based on our review and analysis we present some future avenues for research.

show abstract

Entrepreneurial ecosystems: a dynamic lifecycle model

Cited by 164 publications

References 108 publications

Development of Entrepreneurial Competencies of Employees within the Framework of internal Entrepreneurship Programs in the Region

Development of Entrepreneurial Competencies of Employees within the Framework of internal Entrepreneurship Programs in the Region

Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Entrepreneurial Initiative: Building a Multi-Country Taxonomy

What business schools do to support academic entrepreneurship: a systematic literature review and future research agenda

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About