2013
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1200628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental and genetic variation in leaf anatomy among populations ofAndropogon gerardii(Poaceae) along a precipitation gradient

Abstract: Water availability has driven adaptive variation in leaf structure in populations of A. gerardii, particularly between sand bluestem and big bluestem. Genetically based differences in leaves of A. gerardii indicate adaptive variation and evolutionary forces differentiating sand bluestem from big bluestem. Environmental responses of A. gerardii leaves suggest an ability to adjust to drought, even in populations adapted to mesic home environments.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Biomass production of C 4 grasses, including Andropogon gerardii, is significantly related to precipitation across the Great Plains (Epstein et al 1998) and in response to water availability within tallgrass prairie (Knapp et al 2001). Further, there is evidence that aboveground tissue chemistry, leaf morphology, and genetics vary among ecotypes of A. gerardii reciprocally planted along a longitudinal gradient with a two-fold increase in mean annual precipitation (MAP; Zhang et al 2012, Olsen et al 2013, Gray et al 2014. There is little consensus on how precipitation affects belowground NPP (BNPP; Hayes and Seastedt 1987, McCulley et al 2005, and no knowledge of ecotypic variation in A. gerardii belowground, where the majority of plant biomass in tallgrass prairie resides Matchett 2001, Nippert et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Biomass production of C 4 grasses, including Andropogon gerardii, is significantly related to precipitation across the Great Plains (Epstein et al 1998) and in response to water availability within tallgrass prairie (Knapp et al 2001). Further, there is evidence that aboveground tissue chemistry, leaf morphology, and genetics vary among ecotypes of A. gerardii reciprocally planted along a longitudinal gradient with a two-fold increase in mean annual precipitation (MAP; Zhang et al 2012, Olsen et al 2013, Gray et al 2014. There is little consensus on how precipitation affects belowground NPP (BNPP; Hayes and Seastedt 1987, McCulley et al 2005, and no knowledge of ecotypic variation in A. gerardii belowground, where the majority of plant biomass in tallgrass prairie resides Matchett 2001, Nippert et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ecotypes were assigned to regions where the prairie collection sites were located: central Kansas (CKS), eastern Kansas (EKS), and southern Illinois (SIL). Seeds were germinated and grown in a greenhouse during the summer 2009; Olsen et al (2013) provide information on greenhouse conditions and plant care. Seedlings were transplanted into the common gardens in August 2009 according to a randomized complete block design.…”
Section: Reciprocal Common Garden Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, A. gerardii 's phenotypic response to higher temperature is more idiosyncratic, either increasing (Kakani & Reddy, ), decreasing (Silletti & Knapp, ), responding unimodally (Madakadze et al., ), or not responding at all (Epstein et al., ), although the direction of the response may depend on initial temperature. Consistent with these observations, A. gerardii increases in stature and productivity with increasing precipitation (Epstein et al., ; Johnson et al., ; McMillan, ; Olsen, Caudle, Johnson, Baer & Maricle, ). Tellingly, a reciprocal common garden experiment established across a ~1200 km transect from western Kansas to Illinois demonstrated local adaptation and strong genetic control over growth‐related traits in this species (e.g., biomass, height; Johnson et al., ; Mendola et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors have pointed out its restricted taxonomic value in Festuca (Connor 1960; Kjellqvist 1961; Aiken et al 1985; Aiken and Consaul 1995; Ramesar-Fortner et al 1995) and other grasses (Ruiz-TĂ©llez et al 1998; GieƂwanowska et al 2005; Kuzmanović et al 2012; Olsen et al 2013) because some features may be affected by ecological factors and by phenotype plasticity. However, although the identification of Festuca species using only anatomical variables is complex, most authors agree that it would reduce the possibilities of error and improve the separation of several similar taxa which were indistinguishable based on the morphology of vegetative and reproductive organs (Aiken et al 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%