2020
DOI: 10.1007/698_2020_606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental, Economic, and Ethical Assessment of the Treated Wastewater and Sewage Sludge Valorization in Agriculture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, these elements can be provided The values above show significant correlations with their respective principal component (r 2 = > 0.06) and non-significant correlations were omitted. through the addition of biosolids, which differ from commercial fertilizers that often do not contain these micronutrients (Ammar et al 2020). Regarding the CEC indicator, it was established as having a high capacity, possibly because of the high clay content in the soil and its moderate OM content (Table II) (Noll et al 2019).…”
Section: Soil and Biosolid Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nonetheless, these elements can be provided The values above show significant correlations with their respective principal component (r 2 = > 0.06) and non-significant correlations were omitted. through the addition of biosolids, which differ from commercial fertilizers that often do not contain these micronutrients (Ammar et al 2020). Regarding the CEC indicator, it was established as having a high capacity, possibly because of the high clay content in the soil and its moderate OM content (Table II) (Noll et al 2019).…”
Section: Soil and Biosolid Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2D). On the other hand, the observed dynamics of the N-NH 4 + indicator in T2 and T3 could be attributed to the mineralization of nitrogenous compounds that are easily accessible to the microorganisms of the soil and biosolids (Ammar et al 2020, Medina-Herrera et al 2020.…”
Section: Indicators Related To the N Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…BS presented four times more TN than BM, being a source of N to be exploited by the microbial biomass present during the mineralization of C and N sources. The difference in N content may be due to the nature of the physicochemical composition of the cosubstrates that were used, e.g., BS had a higher concentration of mineralizable N-mainly N-NH 4 + -and a lower C/N ratio [2]. However, the SOC in BM was 37.5% higher compared to BS because BM by nature of its composition presented not only a higher amount of C compounds in general, but also heavier C molecular structures (fiber or more recalcitrant C compounds).…”
Section: Physicochemical Characterization Of Bs and Bmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mexico is no exception to this problem. Most WWTPs apply biological treatment for the sanitation process using activated sludge, obtaining treated water and a quantity of stabilized sludge called "biosolids" (BS) [2]. Water treatment capacity at a national level has been rising over the last decade, having 2766 WWTPs with an installed treatment capacity of 196,000 L s −1 by the year 2020 [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%