Environmental effects of using different construction codes applied to reinforced concrete beam designs based on Model Code 2010 and Spanish Standard EHE-08

Abstract

Assuming specific behavior models, the variety of design codes currently used for the design of concrete beams inevitably results in different solutions, ensuring service during the expected lifetime with a maximum functional quality and safety. However, from a sustainable design perspective, such differences may have remarkable environmental impacts. This paper analyses if the approach of the newest design code, i.e., the Model Code, leads to a reduction in resource consumption and greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) over the life cycle of concrete beams. To do so, a comparative analysis of the environmental impact of concrete beams was carried out depending on the reference code used for their design (i.e., EHE-08 or Model Code). The results show that reducing the amount of reinforcing steel is essential to minimize the life cycle environmental impacts of concrete beams.Every country may have its own design codes and, thus, the reinforcing steel use can vary for structures subjected to the same loads and with equivalent structural reliability. Hence, regulations play a key role in the sustainability of construction assets. Conclusions depend on the beam's length (L), height (h) and characteristic compressive strength (fck). For short beams (4 m), the greater the h, the greater the reinforcement difference between the two codes. With regard to beams with L = 8 m, these differences can lead to varying steel and GHG savings, e.g., up to 5.0 % with MC-2010 (h = 0.6 m and fck ≤ 35 MPa), almost 40 % with EHE -08 (h = 0.6 m and 35 MPa < fck ≤ 50 MPa) and more than 30 % with MC-2010 (h = 1.0 m).. For long beams (L = 12.0 m), steel consumption is 0.3 % to 19 % lower when the beam is designed with EHE-08, and this difference decreases as fck increases.

A systematic review of circular economy research in the construction industry

“…According to Sanchez et al (2019), adaptive reuse of building structures produces a considerable decrease in the environmental impacts and the construction building cost. Besides, studies (such as Almirall et al, 2019;Lai et al, 2017) argued for more focus on policies and regulations in the sustainability of construction assets.…”

Engineering and Design for Sustainable Construction: A Bibliometric Analysis of Current Status and Future Trends

“…The impact of climate change on construction techniques has initiated research on adaptive and climate-resilient designs, such as the impact of sustainable design on climate change, the environmental effects of using different construction codes, etc. [106,[110][111][112][113][114][115][116][117][118][119][120]. There will be a greater emphasis on climate-resilient design in the future, considering adaptive techniques to mitigate extreme weather events, sea-level rise, and urban heat islands.…”

Assessing the Mitigation Potential of Environmental Impacts From Circular Economy Strategies on an Industrial Sector and Its Value Chain: A Case Study on the Steel Value Chain in Quebec

“…Approximately 65% of steel stock in Quebec is retained in construction and represents 35-40% of additional steel needed per year. As Almirall et al (2019) emphasized, legislation and construction code play a fundamental role in material intensity utilization, ensuring maximum quality and safety without minimizing material use for the same standard. Overspecification has been proven, and estimation ranges up to 50% of steel used in construction (Austin, 1998;Allwood et al, 2012Allwood et al, , 2013Moynihan and Allwood, 2014).…”