“…Similar studies investigating the EKC hypothesis at the national level have been conducted by Kunnas and Myllyntaus () for Finland; Ozturk and Acaravci () for Turkey; Park and Lee () for the Republic of Korea; Brajer, Mead, and Xiao (), Jayanthakumaran and Liu (), and Liu, Zhou, and Wu () for China; Bekhet and Othman (), Saboori, Sulaiman, and Mohd (), and Saboori and Sulaiman () for Malaysia; Tiwari, Shahbaz, and Hye () for India; Katircioğlu () for Singapore; Shahbaz, Khraief, Uddin, and Ozturk () for Tunisia; Sugiawan and Managi () for Indonesia; Atasoy () for the United States; and Olale, Ochuodho, Lantz, and El Armali () for Canada. Furthermore, at the regional level, the EKC hypothesis has been tested by a number of scholars, such as Atici () for the central and eastern Europe; Pao and Tsai () for a panel of Brazil, Russia, India, and China countries; Acaravci and Ozturk () for Europe; Arouri, Youssef, M'henni, and Rault () for Middle East and North African countries; Ozcan () for Middle East countries; Bölük and Mert () for a panel of European Union countries; Ozturk () for Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa countries; Heidari, Katircioğlu, and Saeidpour () for five Association of South East Asian Nations countries; Bilgili, Koçak, and Bulut () for 17 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries; Shahbaz, Solarin, and Ozturk () for 19 African countries; Charfeddine and Mrabet () for 15 Middle East and North African countries; and Dong, Sun, Jiang, and Zeng () for 14 Asia‐Pacific countries. In addition, the EKC hypothesis has been examined at the global level by, for example, Alvarado, Ponce, Criollo, Córdova, and Khan (); Paramati, Alam, and Apergis (); Rasli, Qureshi, Isah‐Chikaji, Zaman, and Ahmad (); Shahbaz, Ozturk, Afza, and Ali (); Shuai et al (); Shuai et al (); and Ulucak and Bilgili ().…”