Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis With Considering Ecological Footprint and Governance Quality: Evidence From Emerging Countries

Abstract

Improving the environmental quality and economic growth simultaneously, and examining the variables affecting this nexus, has been one of the most important issues for researchers and policymakers in recent years, especially following the United Nations 2030 Agenda Sustainable Development Goals. The aim of this study is to investigate the nexus among the ecological footprint as a multi-aspect indicator of environmental degradation, economic growth, renewable and non-renewable energies, and governance quality within the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis framework for two panels of European and Asian emerging countries during 1996–2017. For this purpose, we employ second-generation panel techniques that consider cross-sectional dependency in panel data. Augmented Mean Group estimation results indicate an inverted U-shape nexus among the economic growth and ecological footprint, which implies validation of the EKC hypothesis in all two panels of countries. The findings indicate the positive impact of non-renewable energy and the negative influence of governance quality on the ecological footprint in all two panels. At the same time, there is evidence of the negative impact of renewable energy on ecological footprint only in European emerging countries. In summary, the findings recommend that governments and policymakers pay closer attention to implementing non-renewable energy restrictive policies and renewable energy incentive policies. Furthermore, this is important to plan for improving various dimensions of governance quality to achieve better adoption and implementation of environmental policies, especially in the Asian emerging countries where it can lead to a more positive impact on environmental quality according to the results of estimated coefficients.JEL Codes: C33, Q01, Q20, Q50

An empirical assessment of electricity consumption and environmental degradation in the presence of economic complexities

“…However, this liaison is broken at a certain level, meaning that real GDP per capita reduces ecological impediment. Our results affirm the authenticity of studies by Muslija et al (2020), Chu (2020), Adams et al (2020), Satrovic et al (2021), Mahmoodi andDahmardeh (2022), andQamar et al (2022). However, these findings are in contrast with Bese and Friday (2022) demonstrating no inverted U relationship between ecological footprint and external debt.…”

“…The expansion of the economy increases electric power consumption, deteriorating the environment which is closely linked with the anthropogenic emissions. This finding aligns with Khan et al (2019), Neagu (2020), Satrovic et al (2020), Mahmoodi and Dahmardeh (2022), and Massagony and Budiono. (2022).…”

A comparative study on the ecological footprint of living consumption in northwest ethnic regions: 1980–2018

“…Ecological footprint needs. In the ecological footprint research index, various natural resources and energy consumption items are converted into six biological production area types: arable land, grassland, forest land, building land, fossil energy land and water area (Zhang et al, 2001;Mahmoodi and Dahmardeh, 2022). The calculation formula is (Xie et al, 2001):…”

Environmental competitiveness of the economy: Opportunities for its improvement with the help of AI

“…-Natural capital: Favorable natural environment in the economic system (Congjuan et al, 2022); -Resource Intensity: Resource efficiency of the economy (Wang N. et al, 2022); -Social capital: Social cohesion in environmental issues (Popkova et al, 2021); -Intellectual capital: The level of environmental education and the availability of "green" innovations (Popkova et al, 2018); -Governance: The level of development of "green" infrastructure and the state regulators' commitment to environmental priorities (Mahmoodi and Dahmardeh, 2022).…”