Environmental management: Integrating ecological evaluation, remediation, restoration, natural resource damage assessment and long-term stewardship on contaminated lands

Abstract

Ecological evaluation is essential for remediation, restoration, and Natural Resource Damage Assessment (NRDA), and forms the basis for many management practices. These include determining status and trends of biological, physical, or chemical/radiological conditions, conducting environmental impact assessments, performing remedial actions should remediation fail, managing ecosystems and wildlife, and assessing the efficacy of remediation, restoration, and long-term stewardship. The objective of this paper is to explore the meanings of these assessments, examine the relationships among them, and suggest methods of integration that will move environmental management forward. While remediation, restoration, and NRDA, among others, are often conducted separately, it is important to integrate them for contaminated land where the risks to ecoreceptors (including humans) can be high, and the potential damage to functioning ecosystems great. Ecological evaluations can range from inventories of local plants and animals, determinations of reproductive success of particular species, levels of contaminants in organisms, kinds and levels of effects, and environmental impact assessments, to very formal ecological risk assessments for a chemical or other stressor. Such evaluations can range from the individual species to populations, communities, ecosystems or the landscape scale. Ecological evaluations serve as the basis for making decisions about the levels and kinds of remediation, the levels and kinds of restoration possible, and the degree and kinds of natural resource injuries that have occurred because of contamination. Many different disciplines are involved in ecological evaluation, including biologists, conservationists, foresters, restoration ecologists, ecological engineers, economists, hydrologist, and geologists. Since ecological evaluation forms the basis for so many different types of environmental management, it seems reasonable to integrate management options to achieve economies of time, energy, and costs. Integration and iteration among these disciplines is possible only with continued interactions among practitioners, regulators, policy-makers, Native American Tribes, and the general public.

Assessing the environmental management efficiency of manufacturing sectors: evidence from emerging economies

“…In recent years, evaluating environmental management efficiency as a means of sustainable development has attracted a broader audience and dominated much debate (Burger, 2008 Recent studies have explored environmental evaluations for a variety of ecosystems, including forests, rivers, and lakes (Amores et al, 2013;Burger, 2008;Lee et al, 2007;Rodriguez et al, 2011;Vrscaj et al, 2008). Costanza (1992) proposed a way to measure ecosystem health and ecological security that promoted the development of environmental evaluation.…”

“…Environmental indicators are expected to provide an early warning to help prevent environmental, social, and economic damage (Huang et al, 2009). The changing and complex global environment requires the integration of diverse environmental management disciplines and techniques (Burger, 2008). Thus, in recent years, many scholars have begun using multi-indicator methodologies to evaluate the environment.…”

“…Evaluating, improving, and managing the environment are long-standing concerns are now attracting a broader audience (Burger, 2008). One goal of environmental evaluation is to assess environmental management efficiency in order to enhance environmental sustainability.…”

Possibilities and limitations of LCA for the evaluation of soil remediation and cleanup

“…"Interactions among all disciplines and stakeholder groups are essential to forge partnerships that will solve environmental problems, rather than deal with only one aspect in isolation" [34].…”

Can thermal soil remediation be sustainable? A case study of the environmental merit of the remediation of a site contaminated by a light non-aqueous phase liquid (LNAPL)

“…''Interactions among all disciplines and stakeholder groups are essential to forge partnerships that will solve environmental problems, rather than deal with only one aspect in isolation'' (Burger 2008).…”