2023
DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2023.2197825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental sampling for disease surveillance: Recent advances and recommendations for best practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 201 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although various technologies and protocols for the detection or identification of microorganisms in laboratory-based settings exist, rapid and on-site bioaerosol monitoring methods are severely limited mainly due to their low concentration and diversity in indoor or outdoor environments. There are many analytical techniques used for such bioaerosol monitoring, and their advantages and disadvantages have been described systematically by Santarpia and coworkers [ 6 ]. Thus, bioaerosol monitoring essentially requires effective sampling methods followed by appropriate detection techniques for the collected samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although various technologies and protocols for the detection or identification of microorganisms in laboratory-based settings exist, rapid and on-site bioaerosol monitoring methods are severely limited mainly due to their low concentration and diversity in indoor or outdoor environments. There are many analytical techniques used for such bioaerosol monitoring, and their advantages and disadvantages have been described systematically by Santarpia and coworkers [ 6 ]. Thus, bioaerosol monitoring essentially requires effective sampling methods followed by appropriate detection techniques for the collected samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%