Epistemic Informational Structural Realism

Beni, Majid Davoody

doi:10.1007/s11023-016-9403-4

Cited by 13 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…ISR, however, lacks the ontological dimension of LIR and cannot be included in the domain of Natural Philosophy. This position is supported by Beni in [54].…”

Section: Luciano Floridi: Information Philosophy and Informational Stmentioning

confidence: 59%

The Naturalization of Natural Philosophy

Brenner

2018

Philosophies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A new demarcation is proposed between Natural Philosophy and non-Natural Philosophy—philosophy tout court—based on whether or not they follow a non-standard logic of real processes. This non-propositional logic, Logic in Reality (LIR), is based on the original work of the Franco-Romanian thinker Stéphane Lupasco (Bucharest, 1900–Paris, 1988). Many Natural Philosophies remain bounded by dependence on binary linguistic concepts of logic. I claim that LIR can naturalize—bring into science—part of such philosophies. Against the potential objection that my approach blurs the distinction between science and philosophy, I reply that there is no problem in differentiating experimental physical science and philosophy; any complete distinction between philosophy, including the philosophy of science(s) and the other sciences is invidious. It was historically unnecessary and is unnecessary today. The convergence of science and philosophy, proposed by Wu Kun based on implications of the philosophy of information, supports this position. LIR provides a rigorous basis for giving equivalent ontological value to diversity and identity, what is contradictory, inconsistent, absent, missing or past, unconscious, incomplete, and fuzzy as to their positive counterparts. The naturalized Natural Philosophy resulting from the application of these principles is a candidate for the ‘new synthesis’ called for by the editors.

show abstract

“…ISR, however, lacks the ontological dimension of LIR and cannot be included in the domain of Natural Philosophy. This position is supported by Beni in [54].…”

Section: Luciano Floridi: Information Philosophy and Informational Stmentioning

confidence: 59%