1985
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.32.6975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equipotential distribution in the quantum Hall effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experiments aimed at measuring the electrostatic potential distribution were originally carried out by attaching contacts to the interior of the Hall bar and measuring the voltage differences between adjacent contacts. 456,457,458,459,460 It was learned from these studies that relatively small inhomogeneities in the density of the 2DEG have a large effect on these voltage differences in the QHE regime. The main difficulty in the interpretation of such experiments is that the voltage difference measured between two contacts is the difference in electrochemical potential, not the line integral of the electric field.…”
Section: Current Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments aimed at measuring the electrostatic potential distribution were originally carried out by attaching contacts to the interior of the Hall bar and measuring the voltage differences between adjacent contacts. 456,457,458,459,460 It was learned from these studies that relatively small inhomogeneities in the density of the 2DEG have a large effect on these voltage differences in the QHE regime. The main difficulty in the interpretation of such experiments is that the voltage difference measured between two contacts is the difference in electrochemical potential, not the line integral of the electric field.…”
Section: Current Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first experimental method used to measure the current distribution was the direct electrical measurement of the potential distribution by placing a series of metallic contacts in the interior of a Hall bar device [136][137][138]. Outside the plateau regions, it was found that the current distribution varies more or less linearly across the device.…”
Section: Current Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…<en -1)2(8 1 8 2 8, + 8 5 0 6 8, + 8 3 6 4 8 5 + 8 7 8 8 8 1 )/2 from relations (26) and (27). This relation is valid only when the effect of unequal population of edge channels produced by the nonuniform 2D EG is negligibly small compared to that produced by contacts.…”
Section: Influence Of Inhomogeneity In a 2d Egmentioning
confidence: 92%