2004
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.70.139901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: Calculation of uniaxial magnetic anisotropy energy of tetragonal and trigonal Fe, Co, and Ni [Phys. Rev. B69, 104426 (2004)]

Abstract: The matrix describing a trigonal distortion [Eq.(2)] is erroneous. It should read:where d is chosen to conserve the unit-cell volume. The calculations, however, were done with the correct matrix, so this change has no effect on the results or conclusions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With increasing c/a ratio, the anisotropy energy decreases to relatively small negative values. This calculated spin re-orientation transition is consistent with previous DFT calculations, 18 where the effects of tetragonal distortions on pure bct strained Fe were studied. Surprisingly, as the experiments tell us, the interstitial element N-so far neglected-seems to play a decisive role in determining the magnetic anisotropy.…”
Section: -13supporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With increasing c/a ratio, the anisotropy energy decreases to relatively small negative values. This calculated spin re-orientation transition is consistent with previous DFT calculations, 18 where the effects of tetragonal distortions on pure bct strained Fe were studied. Surprisingly, as the experiments tell us, the interstitial element N-so far neglected-seems to play a decisive role in determining the magnetic anisotropy.…”
Section: -13supporting
confidence: 79%
“…They even lead to a sign change of magneto-crystalline anisotropy corresponding to an easy axis re-orientation from [001] to [100] when the ratio of out-of-plane to in-plane lattice constant becomes larger than c/a ≈ 1.07. 18 Moreover, in the case of the related compound bct α ′ -Fe 8 C, K u is even negative, and the easy axis of magnetization lies in the (001) plane. 6 While first believed to be necessary just for the induction of suited distortions, the individual interstitial elements seem to have much more influence on the magnetic properties-in the above a Electronic mail: hzhang@tmm.tu-darmstadt.…”
Section: -13mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us compare Fe 16 bct-Fe, where even for c/a = 1.1 (the c/a ratio for Fe 16 N 2 ) MAE is still rather tiny. 40 In Fig. 7 the calculated MAE in Fe 16 N 2 is shown as a function of c/a.…”
Section: Magnetic Anisotropymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This MAE, which is larger by 3 orders of magnitude than for bcc Fe, occurs theoretically for a composition of about Fe 0:4 Co 0:6 and c=a 1:20-1:25. Also, the predicted easy axis of magnetization for the tetragonal alloy is along the c axis, which facilitates the usage in perpendicular magnetic recording applications.The mechanism responsible for this giant MAE has been identified by an analysis of the electronic states at the ÿ point at the center of the Brillouin zone, which govern the MAE of tetragonal Fe [4,6]. When the cubic symmetry is broken through tetragonal distortion, electronic states that are degenerate in the cubic state will split and cross other states when the c=a ratio is around 1.2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the cubic symmetry is broken through tetragonal distortion, electronic states that are degenerate in the cubic state will split and cross other states when the c=a ratio is around 1.2. From a second order perturbation treatment of the MAE it follows that a strongly enhanced K u can be expected if the alloy concentration is chosen such that the Fermi energy is at the band crossing [4,6]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%