1984
DOI: 10.1063/1.334327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: Electron swarm parameters in rare gases and mixtures [J. Appl. Phys. 5 5, 3293 (1984)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For small grid spacing T e ≫ e|φ k+1 − φ k | this finite-difference scheme has a second order accuracy in △x and gives a correct result on rough grids for the Boltzmann electron distribution. Like for the explicit PIC-MCC method, there exists a restriction on time step ω p △ t < 1, where ω p is the plasma frequency, for solution of the equations (3)- (6) with the Poisson equation (10).…”
Section: Combined Pic-mcc Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For small grid spacing T e ≫ e|φ k+1 − φ k | this finite-difference scheme has a second order accuracy in △x and gives a correct result on rough grids for the Boltzmann electron distribution. Like for the explicit PIC-MCC method, there exists a restriction on time step ω p △ t < 1, where ω p is the plasma frequency, for solution of the equations (3)- (6) with the Poisson equation (10).…”
Section: Combined Pic-mcc Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimal grid spacing is decreased with the gas pressure rise, thus the sheath contains approximately the constant number of nodes. The cross sections of electron scattering in helium are taken from [10], and for argon from [3,10]. The ion-electron emission on electrodes is taken into account with coefficient 0.2 in helium and 0.1 in argon.…”
Section: How Many Simulation Particles We Need?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most probable reason for this disagreement is the increase of ion current to the dust in the case of fast ion drift (or large electrical field) in relation to the OML-based expression (8). This may be explained by the shape of the IEDF, which must be different from the shifted Maxwellian in the presence of ion resonant charge exchange.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was also found that despite the condition of applicability of the OML approach being formally fulfilled (l e,i λ D r d ), the analytical evaluation of ϕ OML does not always provide an accurate value for the floating potential. In other work [12], where a direct current stratified glow discharge was considered, the dust potential was found using equation (8) for the ion current and equation (5) Note that our model does not consider the detailed ion trajectories near the particles. The presence of dust in the discharge is described by giving the probability of electrons and ions capturing during their motion through the cross section σ id (4), which depends on the local dust concentration n d (x), potential ϕ d (x) and the instant electron/ion kinetic energy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation