2008
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.100.019901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: Intermolecular Dynamical Charge Fluctuations in Water: A Signature of the H-Bond Network [Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 187401 (2005)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
84
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
5
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…49 Thus, our experimental results are consistent with the involvement of such extended networks in LR-SIE at air-liquid interfaces. [60][61][62][63][64][65][66] In summary, we demonstrated that the depth of the interfacial layers sampled in our experiments is controlled by nebulizer gas velocity ν G. We found that the larger, rather than the more polarizable, anions are systematically enriched in the thinner (nanoscopic air-liquid-air) films produced at higher gas velocities in all tested solvents (water, methanol, 2-propanol, and acetonitrile). Addition of third ions (beginning at sub-μM levels) specifically perturbs the I − /Br − ratio in water and methanol solutions but has no effect in acetonitrile or 2-propanol.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…49 Thus, our experimental results are consistent with the involvement of such extended networks in LR-SIE at air-liquid interfaces. [60][61][62][63][64][65][66] In summary, we demonstrated that the depth of the interfacial layers sampled in our experiments is controlled by nebulizer gas velocity ν G. We found that the larger, rather than the more polarizable, anions are systematically enriched in the thinner (nanoscopic air-liquid-air) films produced at higher gas velocities in all tested solvents (water, methanol, 2-propanol, and acetonitrile). Addition of third ions (beginning at sub-μM levels) specifically perturbs the I − /Br − ratio in water and methanol solutions but has no effect in acetonitrile or 2-propanol.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…That band is better represented in more sophisticated polarizable models of water, [43][44][45] presumably since those are polarizable also at the hydrogen sites and as such feel more closely the formation of a hydrogen bond, or since those are flexible models. It is however very well established that this band originates from charge flows between water molecules upon hydrogen bonding, 5,[36][37][38][39] and it is quite questionable whether polarizability can describe that effect. The electric field at a polarizable site scales decays quadratically with the distance to an hydrogen bond partner, whereas charge flow effects decrease much steeper with an exponential dependence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 It is well established that simple point charge models of water, such as TIP4P/2005 34 or SPC/E, 35 cannot account for the intensity of that band, since that band originates from charge flows within and between water molecules upon hydrogen bonding. 5,[36][37][38][39] Adding polarizability to a water model, either in an ad hoc manner to a trajectory that has been precalculated with the help of a pointcharge model, [39][40][41][42] or explicitly as part of the force field, [43][44][45] reveals the band in the THz absorption spectrum, albeit, often, with severely underestimated intensity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…101 In this regard, maximally localized Wannier functions (MLWFs), which are obtained via a unitary transformation of the occupied Kohn-Sham electronic states, have been shown to be an extremely useful tool in computing molecular dipole moments in condensed-phase environments. 35,[102][103][104][105] For the case of liquid water, the MLWFs associated with different molecules have only a very minor overlap, 102 and this fact allows for a nearly unique definition of the charges belonging to a given water molecule, thereby eliminating to a large extent the aforementioned partitioning issues when computing molecular dipole moments in the condensed-phase.…”
Section: F Dipole Moment Analysis In Liquid Watermentioning
confidence: 99%