2017
DOI: 10.1038/ng0817-1286c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: Large-scale analyses of common and rare variants identify 12 new loci associated with atrial fibrillation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The GWAS summary data for coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, and stroke were obtained from large-scale GWAS meta-analyses released by corresponding international consortium. 11,31,38 The majority of participants included in GWAS meta-analyses were of European ancestry (ranging from 77% to 100%).…”
Section: Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GWAS summary data for coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, and stroke were obtained from large-scale GWAS meta-analyses released by corresponding international consortium. 11,31,38 The majority of participants included in GWAS meta-analyses were of European ancestry (ranging from 77% to 100%).…”
Section: Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the score derivation using sBayesR, we used summary statistics from the 2017 AF GWAS 30 and sparse LD matrix with 2.8 million single nucleotide polymorphisms calculated from 50k UKBB individuals precomputed to be used with SBayesR (https://zenodo.org/record/3375373#.XvoLFJNKhp9). We removed ambiguous variants with A/T and C/G and variants in the major histocompatibility complex region.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used 5 methods to estimate the genetic risk of AF in this study, including pruning and thresholding, 28 LDpred, 16 LDpred-funct-inf, 18 sBayesR, 17 and PRS-continuous shrinkage (CS). 29 All scores were derived from a 2017 GWAS of AF 30 and validated in independent UKBB individuals. The optimal pruning and thresholding and LDpred scores were previously published.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations