Erratum: Precise Determination of Electroweak Parameters in Neutrino-Nucleon Scattering [Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 091802 (2002)]

Abstract

An additional significant digit is added to the reported experimental measurements in Eqs. (6) -(8) on pages 091802-3. The results with the inclusion of additional precision are sin 2 on-shell W 0:227 73 0:001 35stat 0:000 93syst ÿ 0:000 22 M 2 top ÿ 175 GeV 2 50 GeV 2 0:000 32 ln M Higgs 150 GeV ; (6) 0 0:997 89 0:004 05; sin 2 W 0:226 47 0:003 11;g eff L 2 0:300 05 0:001 37; g eff R 2 0:030 76 0:001 10:The above measurements for g eff L 2 and g eff R 2 are different from those originally reported due to a mistake related to the assumed reference values for M top and M Higgs .The small correlation coefficient for the two parameter g eff L 2 ÿ g eff R 2 fit is now explicitly stated; it is ÿ0:017.

Theoretical overview of atomic parity violation

“…The remaining (correlation) contribution is given by Eq. (12). We computed this correlation correction in SD and CCSDvT approximations.…”

“…Generally, atomic PNC is one of a few probes of electroweak coupling below the Z-pole. Competing and at the same time complementary experiments include determination of the weak charge of electron at SLAC [11] and ν-nucleus deep inelastic scattering by the NuTeV collaboration [12]. With an upgrade at Jefferson Lab, an even more accurate constraint on electroweak coupling is expected to come from a P-violating e − p scattering experiment (Qweak collaboration) [13].…”

Electroweak data and the Higgs boson mass: A case for new physics

“…In the current data, the CL increases appreciably, to 0.51, if A b F B is excluded but much less if A LR is excluded, reflecting 6 The degrees of freedom decrease from 14 to 12 because we follow the recent practice of the EWWG [1] ν N] as "anomalous" simply as a shorthand indication of their deviation from the SM fit, with no judgement intended as to their bona fides.…”

“…[1] 4 The current low CL is a consequence of two 3σ anomalies, together with the evolution of the W boson mass measurement, as shown below. The 3σ anomalies are (1) the discrepancy between the SM determination of x l W = sin 2 θ l W , the effective leptonic weak interaction mixing angle, from three hadronic asymmetry measurements, x l W [A H ], versus its determination from three leptonic measurements, x l W [A L ], and (2) the NuTeV measurement of charged and neutral current (anti)neutrino-nucleon scattering, [6] quoted as an effective on-shell weak interaction mixing angle,…”

Measurement ofsin2θeffleptusinge+e−pairs fromAaltonen1, Amerio2, Amidei3 et al. 2016Phys. Rev. DSelf Cite15040View full textAdd to dashboardCite

“…These effective couplings have been investigated at the Tevatron [4][5][6][7], at the LHC [8][9][10], and at LEP-1 and SLC [11,12]. The on-shell sin 2 θ W coupling has been investigated with neutrino-nucleon collisions at the Tevatron [13] and with electron-proton collisions at HERA [14].…”