Erratum to: A novel anatomic severity grading score for acute Type B aortic dissections and correlation to aortic reinterventions after thoracic endovascular aortic repair

Chen, Shirui; Larion, Sebastian; Ahanchi, Sadaf S.; Ammar, Chad P.; Brandt, Colin T.; Panneton, Jean M.

doi:10.1186/s13019-017-0616-2

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…With rapid development of endovascular technology and related equipment, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has become the first choice for the treatment of Stanford B aortic dissection (Type B aortic dissection, TBAD) because of its minimal trauma, quick recovery, good therapeutic effect and fewer complications ( 1 ). In normal circumstances, the proximal healthy anchoring zone is required to be longer than 15 mm, so that TEVAR can be performed with conventional aortic covered stent ( 2 , 3 ). Insufficient proximal healthy anchoring area (<15 mm) may lead to the reverse avulsion of aortic dissection, endoleak and occlusion of aortic branches.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Treatment for Stanford type B aortic dissection with insufficient anchoring region using castor integrated branched aortic stent graft

Chen,

Liu,

Chen

et al. 2024

Front. Cardiovasc. Med.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundTo investigate the clinical efficacy of Castor integrated branched aortic stent graft for the treatment of Stanford type B aortic dissection with insufficient anchoring area.MethodsRetrospective analysis of clinical data of 26 patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection with insufficient anchoring region (<15 mm) treated by Castor branched aortic stent graft from September 2018 to June 2022 at Ganzhou People's Hospital, including 23 acute cases and 3 chronic cases.ResultsSurgical procedures were successfully performed in all 26 patients, and during the perioperative period no complications occurred, such as cerebrovascular accident, stenosis or occlusion of left subclavian artery, progression of reverse avulsion of aortic dissection, and paraplegia. During the operation 2 patients had a small amount of type I endoleak, which disappeared during the postoperative follow-up. The other patients had good postoperative follow-up results. Review of the aortic CTA indicated good stent morphology with patency of the left subclavian artery.ConclusionsThe Castor integrated branched aortic stent graft expanded the indications for endoluminal treatment for Stanford type B aortic dissection, which can avoid open surgery and has good clinical outcomes.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Treatment for Stanford type B aortic dissection with insufficient anchoring region using castor integrated branched aortic stent graft

Chen,

Liu,

Chen

et al. 2024

Front. Cardiovasc. Med.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Critical appraisal of multidimensional CT measurements following acute open repair of type A aortic dissection

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction To identify patients with aneurysmal degeneration of the native aorta following type A aortic dissection (TAAD), reproducible serial measurements of aortic dimensions are critical. We used a systematic workflow for measuring aortic geometry following TAAD, using computed tomography angiography data, and test its reproducibility. Methods The workflow for aortic measurements included centerline generation, luminal diameter, and area measurement at six anatomically defined locations along the aorta and luminal volumetric measurements in the descending aorta. Two independent observers measured the aortic geometry in 20 surgically repaired TAAD patients, preoperatively and at 3 months follow‐up. To test reproducibility, intraobserver and interobserver agreement scores were analyzed using a concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Results The interobserver agreement scores of the diameter, area, and volumetric measurements in the descending aorta were acceptable. The agreement scores of the area measurements were highest, with CCCs ranging from 0.909 to 0.984. Luminal diameter measurements scored lower than luminal area measurements and were least reproducible at the mid aortic arch (CCC < 0.886). Overall, intraobserver agreement scores were better than interobserver agreement scores (SD of mean difference was 1.89 vs 1.94 for intraobserver vs interobserver diameter measurements, and 0.61 vs 0.66 for area measurements). Conclusion Although overall reproducibility was acceptable in descending aortic measurements, our results show that it remains challenging to reliably measure luminal diameters, compared with areas. To aid identification of early adverse remodeling following acute TAAD, novel two‐ and three‐dimensional measurement techniques are needed that capture locoregional changes in the false lumen and true lumen morphology more accurately.

show abstract

Erratum to: A novel anatomic severity grading score for acute Type B aortic dissections and correlation to aortic reinterventions after thoracic endovascular aortic repair

Cited by 2 publications

References 1 publication

Treatment for Stanford type B aortic dissection with insufficient anchoring region using castor integrated branched aortic stent graft

Treatment for Stanford type B aortic dissection with insufficient anchoring region using castor integrated branched aortic stent graft

Critical appraisal of multidimensional CT measurements following acute open repair of type A aortic dissection

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About