2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum to ‘AC impendance analysis of CsNO3:Al2O3 composite solid electrolyte systems’ by M.V. Madhava Rao, S. Narender Reddy, A. Sadananda Chary [J. Non-Cryst. Solids 352 (2006) 155–159]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the important features in the complex impedance characteristics of the nanocomposite structures is the depression of semicircles in the Cole-Cole plots. This effect was observed in the impedance spectra of RbNO 3 -Al 2 O 3 [7] and CsNO 3 -Al 2 O 3 [29] composites and was attributed to distributed elements in the ionic composite material and material electrode systems. In Fig.…”
Section: Complex Impedance Spectroscopic Studiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the important features in the complex impedance characteristics of the nanocomposite structures is the depression of semicircles in the Cole-Cole plots. This effect was observed in the impedance spectra of RbNO 3 -Al 2 O 3 [7] and CsNO 3 -Al 2 O 3 [29] composites and was attributed to distributed elements in the ionic composite material and material electrode systems. In Fig.…”
Section: Complex Impedance Spectroscopic Studiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…7. The DC conductivity was determined from the Cole-Cole plots [29]. In the multilayer nanocomposite structure, a 2D semiconductor matrix layers will be arranged between the ionic salt layers of nanoscale thickness.…”
Section: Complex Impedance Spectroscopic Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is deduced that the scattered light intensity is inversely proportional to λ 4 . This conclusion is verified in Equation 4, [ 52,53 ] for unit intensity incident light, the scattering intensity of the particle is: Iscatteringbadbreak=8π4a6d2λ4(n21n2+2)2(1badbreak+cos2θ)\[ \begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{{I_{{\rm{scattering}}}} = \frac{{8{\pi ^4}{a^6}}}{{{d^2}{\lambda ^4}}}{{\left( {\frac{{{n^2} - 1}}{{{n^2} + 2}}} \right)}^2}\left( {1 + {{\cos }^2}\theta } \right)}\end{array} \] where d is the distance of the particle from the detection center, θ is the scattering angle.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Therefore, it is deduced that the scattered light intensity is inversely proportional to λ 4 . This conclusion is verified in Equation 4, [52,53] for unit intensity incident light, the scattering intensity of the particle is:…”
Section: Strategies For the Odtm Of Silica Aerogelsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Usually, the occurrence of two resonance signals, at g ≈ 4.2 and 2.0 has been reported [23,24]. In some cases, a resonance near g ≈ 6.0 was also observed [23,24,30] as a shoulder of the resonance near g ≈ 4.2. The resonance at g ≈ 4.2 and 2.0 were discussed by many investigators [23][24][25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Studiesmentioning
confidence: 92%