2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.03.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum to “Exact expression for the magnetic field of a finite cylinder with arbitrary uniform magnetization” [J. Magnet. Magnet. Mater. 456 (2018) 423–432]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Closed-form expressions proposed for themagnetic field of an axially magnetized cylindrical permanent magnet are utilized to evaluate the magnetic field B of the fixed magnet. [50] We validate the results obtained from DNI method by those of a finite element analysis (FEA) carried out in COMSOL Multiphysics and experimental tests. DNI method is fast and efficient compared to FEA and yields accurate results; therefore, it is our default method to evaluate the magnetic torque in rotational magnet pairs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Closed-form expressions proposed for themagnetic field of an axially magnetized cylindrical permanent magnet are utilized to evaluate the magnetic field B of the fixed magnet. [50] We validate the results obtained from DNI method by those of a finite element analysis (FEA) carried out in COMSOL Multiphysics and experimental tests. DNI method is fast and efficient compared to FEA and yields accurate results; therefore, it is our default method to evaluate the magnetic torque in rotational magnet pairs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The cylindrical tile geometry can be seen as a continuation of a previous work, which calculated the magnetic field from a 3D permanent magnetic ring [16]. The magnetic field generated by a whole cylinder is also known [17,18,19,20]. The magnetic field generated by the cylindrical tile has also been considered in the less complex case of a cylinder of infinite length, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 48 ], which is limited to axial magnetization, and refs. [ 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 ], which did not determine the gradient solution. Indeed, no analytical solutions were previously achieved for the gradient when considering diametric magnetization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 47 ] As a matter of fact, only one exact solution has been recently disclosed for magnetic field and gradient, which is limited to the case of axial magnetization, and which anyway requires two distinct representations in order to circumvent computational singularities. [ 48 ] Moreover, some solutions for cylindrical magnets with diametric magnetization have been recently reported, whose computation, however, is hampered by singularities, [ 49 , 50 ] and which are anyway limited to the magnetic field only. [ 49 , 50 , 51 ] Furthermore, an analytical solution has been recently reported for uniformly magnetized cylindrical tiles, which, however, requires multiple representations to circumvent computational singularities, and which is nonetheless limited to magnetic field only.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation