Establishing Nursing Guideline for Nurses Caring With Haematemsis Patients Undergoing Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Osman, Safia; Hassanin, Amira; Salama, Heba

doi:10.21608/mnj.2019.154323

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Thus, the potential benefit of guidelines or practice norms may be lost, which might affect the treatment effect and management quality. 8 , 9 A previous study suggested that physicians tend to be conservative in the management of low-risk UGIB, resulting in higher levels of care and longer hospital LOS. 10 Consequently, the LOS of patients is likely to be significantly prolonged.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical Pathway for Enhanced Recovery in the Management of Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Zhang,

et al. 2023

RMHP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose To explore the effects of the clinical pathway on the outcomes of patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Materials and Methods Randomized controlled trial. The study was conducted in two medical centers in China from 1 June 2022 to 31 December 2022. Patients with a diagnosis of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding who provided written informed consent were consecutively assigned to the intervention group. The patients in the intervention group were treated using the clinical pathway, while the control group received routine care and follow-up. Time, cost, complications, and prognostic indicators were analyzed. Intentional-to-treat analysis and per-protocol analysis were used for data analysis. Results A total of 114 eligible patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding were randomly divided into two groups and included in the intention-to-treat analysis. In addition, 106 patients were included in the per-protocol analysis. The median age of the 106 patients was 57 years (range, 18–92 years) and 83.0% were male. There were no significant differences between groups regarding the baseline characteristics. The intervention group demonstrated a statistically significantly shorter length of stay, lower hospital cost (ie, cost during hospitalization, cost in the emergency room, and cost in the ward), significantly fewer cases of complications, and a higher level of patient satisfaction when compared with the control group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the rates of transfusion, repeat endoscopy, rebleeding readmission, and mortality. Conclusion The implementation of the clinical pathway for patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding may help improve patient outcomes and satisfaction. Trial Registration Number ChiCTR2200060316. Registration Link https://www.chictr.org.cn/ .

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical Pathway for Enhanced Recovery in the Management of Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Zhang,

et al. 2023

RMHP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Establishing Nursing Guideline for Nurses Caring With Haematemsis Patients Undergoing Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Clinical Pathway for Enhanced Recovery in the Management of Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Clinical Pathway for Enhanced Recovery in the Management of Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About