Establishment of Normative data for Monaural recordings of Auditory Brainstem Response and its Application in screening Patients with Hearing Loss: A Cohort Study

Chalak, Shivaji S; Kale, Anita; Deshpande, Vinuta; Biswas, Dibakar

doi:10.7860/jcdr/2013/6768.3730

Cited by 14 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Of these, 23 had mild CMT neuropathy score (CMTNS, ≤ 10) and 17 had moderate (10 < CMTNS ≤ 21) CMTNS. No CMT1A patients had prolonged click auditory brainstem response (ABR) latencies compared to normative data 8 . Also, no CMT1A patients showed absent distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 94%

Hidden hearing loss in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A

Choi

Seok

Ahn

et al. 2018

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to investigate hidden hearing loss in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1 A (CMT1A), a common inherited demyelinating neuropathy. By using pure-tone audiometry, 43 patients with CMT1A and 60 healthy controls with normal sound detection abilities were enrolled. Speech perception in quiet and noisy backgrounds, spectral ripple discrimination (SRD), and temporal modulation detection (TMD) were measured. Although CMT1A patients and healthy controls had similar pure-tone thresholds and speech perception scores in a quiet background, CMT1A patients had significantly (p < 0.05) decreased speech perception ability in a noisy background compared to controls. CMT1A patients showed significantly decreased temporal and spectral resolution (both p < 0.05). Also, auditory temporal processing of CMT1A patients was correlated with speech perception in a noisy background (r = 0.447, p < 0.01) and median motor conduction velocity (r = 0.335, p < 0.05). Therefore, we assumed that demyelination of auditory nerve in CMT1A causes defective cochlear neurotransmission, which reduces temporal resolution and speech perception in a noisy background. Because the temporal resolution test was well correlated with the degree of demyelination in auditory and peripheral motor nerves, temporal resolution testing could be performed as an additional marker for CMT1A.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 94%

Hidden hearing loss in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A

Choi

Seok

Ahn

et al. 2018

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“… 10 17 This result shows that the peripheral transmission matures faster as compared with subsequent waveforms and the same reasoning cannot be applied to reductions of interpeaks I to III, III to V, and I to V between the two assessments due to improper myelination of auditory pathway and improper efficacy of higher-order neurons in infant population. 21 …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Auditory Brainstem Response in Term and Preterm Infants with Neonatal Complications: The Importance of the Sequential Evaluation

Silva¹,

Lopez

Mantovani³

2014

Int. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction Literature data are not conclusive as to the influence of neonatal complications in the maturational process of the auditory system observed by auditory brainstem response (ABR) in infants at term and preterm. Objectives Check the real influence of the neonatal complications in infants by the sequential auditory evaluation. Methods Historical cohort study in a tertiary referral center. A total of 114 neonates met inclusion criteria: treatment at the Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening Program of the local hospital; at least one risk indicator for hearing loss; presence in both evaluations (the first one after hospital discharge from the neonatal unit and the second one at 6 months old); all latencies in ABR and transient otoacoustic emissions present in both ears. Results The complications that most influenced the ABR findings were Apgar scores less than 6 at 5 minutes, gestational age, intensive care unit stay, peri-intraventricular hemorrhage, and mechanical ventilation. Conclusion Sequential auditory evaluation is necessary in premature and term newborns with risk indicators for hearing loss to correctly identify injuries in the auditory pathway.

show abstract

“…A study investigating the generation sites of ABRs in cats revealed the first wave (I) of the ABR reflects activity of the spiral ganglion cells at the distal part of the eighth auditory nerve, wave II is predominantly from the globular cells in the cochlear nucleus, wave III is generated by the cochlear nucleus spherical cells and globular cells, and waves IV and V generate from the medial superior olive and its projections to the nuclei in the lateral lemniscus and the inferior colliculus (Melcher and Kiang, 1996 ). These electrophysiological responses are typically less than a microvolt in amplitude (Burkard and Secor, 2002 ; Chalak et al, 2013 ). The success of revealing true and reliable responses relies heavily on averaging techniques employed to reduce noise contamination thereby improving the signal to noise ratio (Burkard and Secor, 2002 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As a result, the latency between waves I and V is usually extended from the normative value by more than 0.2 ms (Wilson et al, 1992 ). Normative ABR latency values, for clicks at 70 dB nHL, collected on the most reliable waves I, III, and V are, respectively, 1.66, 3.68, and 5.64 ms for the left ear, and 1.66, 3.65, and 5.59 ms for the right ear (Chalak et al, 2013 ). When comparing between genders of the same age, the latencies are shorter and the amplitudes are larger in women compared to men (Hultcrantz et al, 2006 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Auditory Brainstem Responses in Tinnitus: A Review of Who, How, and What?

Milloy

Fournier

Benoît

et al. 2017

Front. Aging Neurosci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The auditory brainstem response (ABR) in tinnitus subjects has been extensively investigated over the last decade with the hopes of finding possible abnormalities related to the pathology. Despite this effort, the use of the ABR for tinnitus diagnosis or as an outcome measure is under debate. The present study reviewed published literature on ABR and tinnitus. The authors searched PubMed, MedLine, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL, and identified additional records through manually searching reference lists and gray literature. There were 4,566 articles identified through database searching and 151 additional studies through the manual search (4,717 total): 2,128 articles were removed as duplicates, and 2,567 records did not meet eligibility criteria. From the final 22 articles that were included, ABR results from 1,240 tinnitus subjects and 664 control subjects were compiled and summarized with a focus on three main areas: the participant characteristics, the methodology used, and the outcome measures of amplitude and/or latency of waves I, III, and V. The results indicate a high level of heterogeneity between the studies for all the assessed areas. Amplitude and latency differences between tinnitus and controls were not consistent between studies. Nevertheless, the longer latency and reduced amplitude of wave I for the tinnitus group with normal hearing compared to matched controls was the most consistent finding across studies. These results support the need for greater stratification of the tinnitus population and the importance of a standardized ABR method to make comparisons between studies possible.

show abstract

Establishment of Normative data for Monaural recordings of Auditory Brainstem Response and its Application in screening Patients with Hearing Loss: A Cohort Study

Cited by 14 publications

References 8 publications

Hidden hearing loss in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A

Hidden hearing loss in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A

Auditory Brainstem Response in Term and Preterm Infants with Neonatal Complications: The Importance of the Sequential Evaluation

Auditory Brainstem Responses in Tinnitus: A Review of Who, How, and What?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About