1998
DOI: 10.2172/12729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimated bounds on rock permeability changes from THM Processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The base of the prism is fixed in the vertical direction, but allowed to move in the horizontal directions. The model boundary conditions are intended to approximate in situ conditions and are similar to those used in previous thermomechanical modeling (Berge et al 1998) and are based on field stress measurements. Fracture-deformation values estimated at a series of times are then used to compute permeability change in a cross section perpendicular to the emplacement drift.…”
Section: Distinct-element Calculation Of Tm Effect On Permeability -Ementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The base of the prism is fixed in the vertical direction, but allowed to move in the horizontal directions. The model boundary conditions are intended to approximate in situ conditions and are similar to those used in previous thermomechanical modeling (Berge et al 1998) and are based on field stress measurements. Fracture-deformation values estimated at a series of times are then used to compute permeability change in a cross section perpendicular to the emplacement drift.…”
Section: Distinct-element Calculation Of Tm Effect On Permeability -Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial efforts to integrate shear deformation into THM analysis for YMP used the approach presented by Berge et al 1998 in which a continuum model was used to predict zones where shear deformation could be expected on fractures of a given orientation. This approach was used to simulate the SHT and the DST and was applied to emplacement drift geometry in the Near-field Altered-Zone Models Report (Hardin 1998).…”
Section: Coupled Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%