“…Stomatal proxy pCO 2 reconstructions currently offer the highest-resolution record of Eocene pCO 2 , with almost 50 data points, compared to ∼10 each derived from marine alkenone and boron isotopes, and ∼20 from paleosols. The numerous studies, using various fossil angiosperms as well as the fossil gymnosperms Ginkgo and Metasequoia, in the three stomatal proxy methods currently in use mostly agree that the Eocene pCO 2 was more moderately elevated compared to what marine proxies and climate modeling suggest (McElwain, 1998;Kürschner et al, 2001;Royer et al, 2001;Greenwood et al, 2003b;Retallack, 2009;Smith et al, 2010;Doria et al, 2011;Grein et al, 2011;Roth-Nebelsick et al, 2012;Franks et al, 2014;Maxbauer et al, 2014;Liu et al, 2016;Steinthorsdottir et al, 2016;Wolfe et al, 2017). The discrepancy between the marine isotope and stomatal proxy pCO 2 results is considerable, with the marine isotopes recording pCO 2 currently assumed to be more consistent with the elevated Eocene temperatures recorded by numerous proxies and the workings of the Earth's climate system (Cramwinckel et al, 2018).…”