2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating consumers’ willingness to pay for reusable food containers when ordering delivery food: A contingent valuation approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When consumers choose an online platform as a shopping channel, they are able to enjoy a wealth of choices, more detailed product descriptions, and comparable prices (Schuermann and Woo, 2022 ). However, due to the intangible nature of online transactions, consumers may also need to bear some unpleasant consequences caused by unexpected product performance, payment issues, and problems in the delivery process—this is known as perceived risk.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…When consumers choose an online platform as a shopping channel, they are able to enjoy a wealth of choices, more detailed product descriptions, and comparable prices (Schuermann and Woo, 2022 ). However, due to the intangible nature of online transactions, consumers may also need to bear some unpleasant consequences caused by unexpected product performance, payment issues, and problems in the delivery process—this is known as perceived risk.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the perceived risk of online takeout packaging, it refers to a series of possible uncertain situations that are subjectively inferred by consumers about takeout packaging (Schuermann and Woo, 2022 ). Thus, perceived risk differs from objective risk in that it exists only due to the subjective judgment of consumers.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ureta et al (2022) studied more than 1500 residents of South Carolina, to assess their willingness to pay for ecosystem services improvements, and concluded that the mean WTP is in the range of $0.3 and $6.39 and established a model for payment for ecosystem services. Schuermann & Woo (2022) assessed the WTP for reusable food containers in South Korean market and concluded that food companies are willing to pay up to $2.18 per container. This has the potential to contribute to environment sustainability significantly.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%