2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2011.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating maternal and prenatal exposure to glyphosate in the community setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…4 Although humans are not a direct target, they could be in contact with glyphosate due to occupational exposure 5,6 and/or through dietary exposure. 7,8…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 Although humans are not a direct target, they could be in contact with glyphosate due to occupational exposure 5,6 and/or through dietary exposure. 7,8…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Although humans are not a direct target, they could be in contact with glyphosate due to occupational exposure 5,6 and/or through dietary exposure. 7,8 Pesticides as active ingredients are combined with other ingredients to create the commercial formulas on the market. Other ingredients include a wide array of compounds; information regarding some of these is considered confidential business information and they are not of public-free access.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Lavy's work provided the highest estimates of worker exposure that have been seen.) Acquavella et al (2004) in their extensive evaluation of farm workers estimated a maximum systemic dose of approximately 4 μg/kg; dietary intake (McQueen et al 2012) and household exposures (Curwin et al 2007) fall in a similar range. The levels in the Bolognesi et al experiments will occur only after suicide attempts (Roberts et al 2010;Zouaoui et al 2013).…”
Section: Examples Of Inadequate Peer Reviewmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…de tipo congénito. 31 Así mismo De Araujo y col. luego de sus análisis de expuestos y no expuestos encontraron que "la asociación de GLY con NTD no fue significativa cuando se adoptó un modelo de pesticidas múltiples en el análisis de regresión logística (OR = 1.5; 0.8 2.9)", en conclusión ellos no encontraron una asociación causal entre la exposición de los padres a glifosato antes o durante el embarazo y la presentación de defectos congénitos. 15 Carmichael y col. luego de llevar a cabo un estudio de casos y controles evaluando la influencia de la proximidad de zonas de aspersión (un radio de 500 metros), con madres embarazadas en estadio temprano y su repercusión en el nacimiento de niños, luego de la recolección de información no encontraron asociación entre el glifosato u otro pesticida con un riesgo mayor de producirse esta malformación OR = 0,88 (0,48-1,64).…”
Section: Análisis De Los Artículos Ingresadosunclassified