2018
DOI: 10.1080/09715010.2018.1471363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating soil hydraulic properties using mini disk infiltrometer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of θr α n and Ks estimated by inverse modeling for the Argisols are corroborated by those obtained by Rashid et al (2015), that in an argisol cultivated with oil palm, using tension infiltrometer obtained by inverse method values of θr (0.279 to 0.291 (cm 3 cm -3 ) α (0.508 to 0.908 cm -1 ), n (1.34 to 2.032) and Ks (0.0105 to 0.0308 cm min -1 ) in points sampled between plants, values close to those obtained in this work. Naik et al (2018) estimated by inverse modeling the parameters α, n and Ks in four types of sandy, medium-textured, clayey and silty soils using accumulated infiltration data obtained by a mini-tension infiltrometer. For the soil that most closely resembles the argisol evaluated in this work, the values obtained by this author were α (0.129), n (2.473) e Ks (0.009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The values of θr α n and Ks estimated by inverse modeling for the Argisols are corroborated by those obtained by Rashid et al (2015), that in an argisol cultivated with oil palm, using tension infiltrometer obtained by inverse method values of θr (0.279 to 0.291 (cm 3 cm -3 ) α (0.508 to 0.908 cm -1 ), n (1.34 to 2.032) and Ks (0.0105 to 0.0308 cm min -1 ) in points sampled between plants, values close to those obtained in this work. Naik et al (2018) estimated by inverse modeling the parameters α, n and Ks in four types of sandy, medium-textured, clayey and silty soils using accumulated infiltration data obtained by a mini-tension infiltrometer. For the soil that most closely resembles the argisol evaluated in this work, the values obtained by this author were α (0.129), n (2.473) e Ks (0.009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, many publications have been presented by authors from several countries offering approaches and use of the inverse method models (Alletto et al, 2015;El-Nesr et al, 2014;Pollalis and Valiantzas, 2015;Rashid et al, 2015, Sedaghatdoost et al, 2017, Naik et al, 2018, Vogeler et al, 2019. Various studies have shown that micro-aggregated, strongly weathered tropical soils have different water retention properties than temperate-region soils because of differences in mineralogy and weathering history (Tomasella and Hodnett, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A minidisk infiltrometer (Decagon Devices 2012) test was conducted to determine the soil sorptivity and hydraulic conductivity of the ash-covered soils after completion of the rainfall simulation experiments. This test is widely used for measuring soil hydraulic properties because of its low price, small dimensions, and ease of use [52][53][54]. The measurements were performed according to the technical manual (Decagon Device 2012) and previous studies [54,55].…”
Section: Minidisk Infiltrometer Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the different procedures developed to estimate soil hydraulic properties, numerical methods involving inverse solution of Richards equation (Simunek and van Genuchten, 1997;Simunek et al, 1998;Ramos et al 2006;Rashid et al, 2015;Naik et al, 2018;da Silva Junior et al, 2020) are increasingly used. Primal advantage of inverse solution approach is that both, the soil water retention and hydraulic conductivity curves can be estimated simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last years, many works have been published offering comparisons between the inverse solution method and different approaches to estimate soil hydraulic parameters. However, most of them only included direct TDI measurements or laboratory data as comparative results (Ramos et al, 2006;Naik et al, 2018;da Silva Junior et al, 2020). Also, infiltration measurements have been compared with PTFs method for estimating soil hydraulic conductivity (Lee, 2005;Mermound and Xu, 2006;Shein et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%