2015
DOI: 10.2134/agronmonogr47.c10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Surface Wetness on Plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
(197 reference statements)
0
19
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…2.4 | Climate measurements LWS data were only available for limited periods in the wet season of 2011 and 2012. The use of dielectric sensors as a proxy for actual leaf wetness is limited by several factors, including leaf surface traits to retain or repel water (Armstrong, Barthakur, & Norris, 1993;Sentelhas, Monteiro, & Gillespie, 2004) and the high level of spatial variation in wetness condition and duration throughout a complex canopy (Giesler, Horst, & Yuen, 1996;Magarey, Seem, Weiss, Gillespoe, & Huber, 2005). Therefore, we constrain our use of LWS data to generalized relationships between sap flux and leaf wetness.…”
Section: Transpiration Measurement and Upscalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.4 | Climate measurements LWS data were only available for limited periods in the wet season of 2011 and 2012. The use of dielectric sensors as a proxy for actual leaf wetness is limited by several factors, including leaf surface traits to retain or repel water (Armstrong, Barthakur, & Norris, 1993;Sentelhas, Monteiro, & Gillespie, 2004) and the high level of spatial variation in wetness condition and duration throughout a complex canopy (Giesler, Horst, & Yuen, 1996;Magarey, Seem, Weiss, Gillespoe, & Huber, 2005). Therefore, we constrain our use of LWS data to generalized relationships between sap flux and leaf wetness.…”
Section: Transpiration Measurement and Upscalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This threshold has been adjusted in a number of models used throughout Europe; i.e, the French model, Milsol, uses a threshold of 86% (Gaucher, personal communication) and the Danish Blight management uses a threshold of 88% (Hansen, personal communication). There are a number of reasons to opt for lower risk when deciding on which reported relative humidity threshold should be considered blight favorable, such as accuracy of measurements, distance between weather data source and the production area, topography of the area, physiological and phenological differences in crop haulm density and shaded areas of the production fields [49,97,98].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unpainted flat panel sensors were used to detect occurrence of wetness under the shade. Because unpainted sensors tended to detect less wetness duration when small water droplets were formed on the sensors [4] , a pair of wetness sensors was installed [5] , [6] . It was assumed that wetness occurred when wetness was detected by at least one sensor.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%