2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.11.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the density of a jaguar population in the Brazilian Pantanal using camera-traps and capture–recapture sampling in combination with GPS radio-telemetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

17
307
9
20

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 326 publications
(353 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
17
307
9
20
Order By: Relevance
“…All surveys ran for a period of 62 days, cameras operated 24 hours per day and each 24-hour period constituted a sampling occasion. Sixty-two days was selected as a period that would ensure at least 1,000 camera-trap days (24-hour periods in which a camera station was operational) but that would not compromise population closure assumptions (Soisalo & Cavalcanti, 2006). Spoor surveys were analysed using techniques developed by Stander (1998) and Funston et al (2001).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All surveys ran for a period of 62 days, cameras operated 24 hours per day and each 24-hour period constituted a sampling occasion. Sixty-two days was selected as a period that would ensure at least 1,000 camera-trap days (24-hour periods in which a camera station was operational) but that would not compromise population closure assumptions (Soisalo & Cavalcanti, 2006). Spoor surveys were analysed using techniques developed by Stander (1998) and Funston et al (2001).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cullen et al 2005, Soisalo & Cavalcanti 2006, their large area requirements (Sanderson et al 2002b, Cullen et al 2005 and also because they are preferential targets to hunters (Redford 1992, Peres 1996, Cullen et al 2001, Travassos 2011. These factors has conducted to the loss of these animals in tropical forests, promoting profound transformations in forest dynamics and threaten the maintenance of these ecosystems (Stoner et al 2007, Jorge et al 2013, Kurten 2013, Harrison et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A utilização de armadilhas fotográficas em estudos desenvolvidos no Brasil pode ser considerada recente, sendo empregadas na amostragem qualitativa da mastofauna (MARQUES & RAMOS 2001, SANTOS-FILHO & SILVA 2002, SILVEIRA et al 2003, TROLLE 2003a, b, ALVES & ANDRIOLO 2005, SRBEK-ARAUJO & CHIARELLO 2005, na realização de estudos populacionais (TROLLE & KÉRY 2003, SOISALO & CAVALCANTI 2006) e como ferramenta complementar na obtenção de dados ecológicos (SANTOS-FILHO & SILVA 2002, TROLLE 2003b, JÁCOMO et al 2004, ALVES & ANDRIOLO 2005, MIRANDA et al 2005, GALETTI et al 2006. CUTLER & SWANN (1999) equipments.…”
unclassified