2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of an Instrument-Defined Minimally Important Difference in EQ-5D-5L Index Scores Based on Scoring Algorithms Derived Using the EQ-VT Version 2 Valuation Protocols

Abstract: Objectives: To estimate and compare the minimally important difference (MID) in index score of country-specific EQ-5D-5L scoring algorithms developed using EuroQol Valuation Technology protocol version 2, including algorithms from Germany,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The largest difference between the present and previous values was observed in the age group of 60 to 69 years; nevertheless, the difference was only 0.024, which is smaller than the minimal clinically important difference for the EQ-5D-5L. 27…”
Section: Response Rate and Demographic Factorscontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…The largest difference between the present and previous values was observed in the age group of 60 to 69 years; nevertheless, the difference was only 0.024, which is smaller than the minimal clinically important difference for the EQ-5D-5L. 27…”
Section: Response Rate and Demographic Factorscontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…For example, it is likely that a disutility value of 0.1 estimated by EQ-5D-Y does not correspond to a similar degree of deterioration of the health states as a disutility value of 0.1 measured by the adult EQ-5D instrument. Although the minimal important difference of EQ-5D-Y has not been reported yet, it could be smaller than that of adult EQ-5D [34]. These differences should be taken into consideration while interpreting our results; problems may arise if these differences are ignored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…No data were found analysing the convergence of the EQ-5D index values with declared diabetes in the general population. In Henry et al [82] authors estimated the minimally important difference (MID) for EQ-5D-5L scoring algorithms, including that from the Polish population. The mean result was 0.080 (0.030).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%